Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability

• Christopher McCrudden ^[1] ; John McGarry ^[1] ; Brendan O'Leary ^[2] ; Alex Schwartz ^[1]
  1. [1] Queen's University

     Queen's University

     Canadá

     
  2. [2] University of Pennsylvania

     University of Pennsylvania

     City of Philadelphia, Estados Unidos

     
• Localización: Government and opposition: An international journal of comparative politics, ISSN 0017-257X, Nº. 1, 2016, págs. 30-58
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Northern Ireland’s consociational institutions were reviewed by a committee of its Assembly in 2012–13. The arguments of both critics and exponents of the arrangements are of general interest to scholars of comparative politics, power-sharing and constitutional design. The authors of this article review the debates and evidence on the d’Hondt rule of executive formation, political designation, the likely impact of changing district magnitudes for assembly elections, and existing patterns of opposition and accountability. They evaluate the scholarly, political and legal literature before commending the merits of maintaining the existing system, including the rules under which the system might be modified in future.