The effects of lawn signs on vote outcomes: Results from four randomized field experiments

• Donald P. Green ^[1] ; Jonathan S. Krasno ^[2] ; Alexander Coppock ^[1] ; Benjamin D. Farrer ; Brandon Lenoir ^[3] ; Joshua N. Zingher ^[4]
  1. [1] Columbia University

     Columbia University

     Estados Unidos

     
  2. [2] Binghamton University

     Binghamton University

     City of Binghamton, Estados Unidos

     
  3. [3] High Point University

     High Point University

     Township of High Point, Estados Unidos

     
  4. [4] Old Dominion University

     Old Dominion University

     Estados Unidos

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Electoral Studies: An international Journal, ISSN 0261-3794, Nº 41, 2016, págs. 143-150
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.002
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Although lawn signs rank among the most widely used campaign tactics, little scholarly attention has been paid to the question of whether they actually generate votes. Working in collaboration with a congressional candidate, a mayoral candidate, an independent expenditure campaign directed against a gubernatorial candidate, and a candidate for county commissioner, we tested the effects of lawn signs by planting them in randomly selected voting precincts. Electoral results pooled over all four studies suggest that signs increased advertising candidates’ vote shares. Results also provide some evidence that the effects of lawn signs spill over into adjacent untreated voting precincts.