Teorías de la justicia intergeneracional.: Una sinopsis

• Autores: Axel Gosseries, Iñigo González Ricoy (trad.)
• Localización: Revista jurídica Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, ISSN 1575-720X, Nº. 32, 2015, págs. 217-237
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    En este artículo, el autor ofrece una sinopsis de las diversas teorías de la jsuticia intergeneracional, en relación a dos dimensiones (ahorro/desahorro) y tres modalidades (prohibición, autorización, obligación). TRas presentar sucesivamente los enfoques de la reciprocidad indirecta, de la ventaja mutua y utilitarista, se presta especial atención a la teoría igualitarista de la justicia intergeneracional. Se subrayan dos diferencias clave entre la perspectiva ogualitarista de la justicia intergeneracional y la interpretación estándar de la sostenibilidad.

  • English

    In this paper, the author offers a synoptic view of different theories of intergenerational justice, along two dimensions (saving/dissaving) and three modalities (prohibition, authorisation, obligation). After presenting successively the indirect reciprocity, the mutual advantage and the utilitarian approaches, special attention is given to the egalitarian theory of intergenerational justice. Two key differences between the egalitarian view on intergenerational justice and the standard interpretation of sustainability are highlighted.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ARRHENIUS, G., «Mutual Advantage Contractarianism and Future Generations», Theoria, 65(1), 25-35, 1999.
  • BARRY, B., «Justice as Reciprocity», in Liberty and Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • BIRNBACHER, D., «Can discounting be justifi ed?», International Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 42-53, 2003.
  • BONIN, P.-Y., «Neutralité libérale et croissance économique», Dialogue, 36 , 683-703,1997.
  • BRÄNVALL, M.-L., R. BINDLER, EMTERYD, O. & I. RENBERG, «Four thousand years of atmospheric lead pollution in northern Europe: a summary...
  • BURKE, E., Refl ections on the French Revolution, Cambridge (Mass.): The Harvard Classics, 1909-14.
  • CASAL, P., «Why Suffi ciency is Not Enough», Ethics, 117(2), 296-326, 2007.
  • CHAUVEL, L., Le destin des générations. Structure sociale et cohortes en France au xxe siècle, Paris, PUF, 1998, x + 301 p., annexes,...
  • COSANDEY, D., La faillite coupable des retraites. Comment nos assurances vieillesse font chuter la natalité, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2003.
  • COWEN, T. & PARFIT, D., «Against the Social Discount Rate», in Justice between age groups and generations, P. Laslett & J. Fishkin...
  • DALY, H., Beyond Growth. The economics of sustainable development, Boston, Beacon Press, 1996.
  • DE SHALIT, A., Why Posterity Matters. Environmental policies and future generations, London, Routledge, 1995.
  • DIAMOND, J., Collapse. How societies choose to fail or survive, XXX, Viking Books. 2005.
  • DWORKIN, R., Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press, 2000.
  • ELLIOT, R., «Future Generations, Locke’s Proviso and Libertarian Justice», Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3(2), 217-227, 1986.
  • GASPART, F. & GOSSERIES A., «Are Generational Savings Unjust?», Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6 (2),193-217, 2007.
  • GAUTHIER, D., Morals by agreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
  • GILFILLAN, S. C., «Lead Poisoning and the Fall of Rome», J. Occup. Med., 7, 53-60, 1965.
  • GOSSERIES, A., «De la nécessité de distinguer protection de l’environnement, conservation de la nature et conservation de la biodiversité....
  • GOSSERIES, A., «L’éthique environnementale aujourd’hui», Revue philosophique de Louvain, vol. 96 (3), 401-405, 1998.
  • GOSSERIES, A., Penser la justice entre les générations, Paris: Aubier-Flammarion, 2004a.
  • GOSSERIES, A., «Historical Emissions and Free-riding», Ethical Perspectives, 11 (1), 36-60, 2004b.
  • GOSSERIES, A., 2007. «Cosmopolitan Luck Egalitarianism and the Greenhouse Effect», Canadian J. of Phil., suppl. vol. 31: 279-309.
  • GOSSERIES, A., 2008 «Radiological Protection and Intergenerational Justice», in G. Eggermont & B. Feltz (eds.), Ethics and Radiological...
  • GOSSERIES, A., 2009. «Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity», in A. Gosseries & L. Meyer (eds.), Intergenerational Justice, Oxford:...
  • HEATH, J., «Intergenerational Cooperation and Distributive Justice», Canadian J. of Phil., 27(3), 361-376, 1997.
  • JAURÈS, J., Études socialistes, Paris: P. Ollendorf, 1902, retrieved in april 2008 from: .
  • JEFFERSON, Th., «Letter to James Madison» (6 sept 1789), Disponible sur: .
  • LESSLER L., «Lead and Lead Poisoning from Antiquity to Modern Times», Ohio J. Sci, 88(3), 78-84, 1988.
  • LOCKE J., Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (I. Shapiro, ed.), New Haven/Londres: Yale University Press, 2003.
  • MARÉCHAL, J.-P. & Quenault, B. (eds), Le développement durable. Une perspective pour le XXIè siècle, Rennes: PUR, 2005.
  • PONTING, Cl., A Green History Of The World. The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations, New York: Penguin, 1993.
  • RAWLS, J., 1999 (Orig. 1971), A Theory of Justice (revised edition), Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • SMART, J.J.C. & B. WILLIAMS, Utilitarianism. For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
  • STEINER, H., An Essay on Rights, Oxford, Blackwell, 1994.
  • STERN, N., The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • THOMSON D., Selfi sh Generations? How Welfare States Grow Old, The White Horse Press (Revised Edition, 1996).
  • WADE-BENZONI, K. A., «A Golden Rule Over Time: Reciprocity in Intergenerational Allocation Decisions», Academy of Management Journal, 45(5),1011-1028,...
  • WALDRON, J., «Enough And As Good Left For Others», Philosophical Quarterly, 29, p. 319-328, 1979.
  • WCED (World Commission on the Environment and Development), Our Common Future, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 1987.
  • WILLETTS, D. (2010)., The Pinch: How the Baby Boomers Took Their Children’s Future – And Why They Should Give It Back.