Poder y Organización en los Partidos Políticos I

• Panebianco, Angelo ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Bologna

     University of Bologna

     Bolonia, Italia

     
• Localización: Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, ISSN 2448-492X, ISSN-e 0185-1918, Vol. 39, Nº. 156, 1994, págs. 13-29
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.1016/49949
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • Se pretende mostrar la utilidad de los instrumentos del análisis organizativo (en la variante de la aproximación “conflictual”) para el estudio de la política, procediendo en tres tiempos: 1. La estadística de la organización: rol de los “fines” organizativos, naturaleza del poder, vínculo impuesto por la estructura organizativa, características de las relaciones entre organización y ambiente; 2. La dinámica organizativa: génesis de las organizaciones, de la institucionalización y del cambio organizativo; 3. Las organizaciones políticas propiamente dichas. En este trabajo se revisan algunos aspectos relacionados con el primer punto.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abell, P. (1975), Organization as Bargaining and Influence Systems, London, Heinemann.
  • Alberti, G. (1982), Società e organizzazione,Bologna, Editrice Compositori.
  • Allison, G.T. (1971), Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
  • Astley, G. y Van de Ven, A. (1983), “Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory”, en Administrative Science Quarterly, núm. 28,...
  • Bacharach, S. y Lawler, E. (1980), Power and Politics in Organizations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Barry, B.M. (1970), Sociologists, Economists and Democracy, London, Macmillan.
  • Barry, B.M. (1976), Power and Political Theory, New York, Wiley.
  • Blau, P. y Scott, R. (1962), Formal San Francisco, Chandler.
  • Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York, Wiley.
  • Burns, T. y Flam, H. (1987), The Shaping of Social Organization, London, Sage.
  • Burrel, G. y Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London, Heinemann.
  • Collins, R. (1975), Conflict Sociology, New York, Academic Press.
  • Crozier, M. y Friedeberg, E. (1977), L’acteur et le système. Les contraintes de l’action collective, Paris, Seuil.
  • Crozier, M. (1963), Le phénomène bureacratique, Paris, Seuil.
  • Cyert, R.E. March, J. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
  • Dahrendorf, R. (1975), Soziale Klassen in der indusrtiellen Gesellschaft, Stuttgart.
  • Dalton, M. (1959), Men Who Manage, New York, Wiley.
  • Daudi, P. (1989), The Discourse of Power in Manegerial Praxis, Oxford, Brasil Blackwell.
  • Eckstein, H. y Gurr, Tr. (1975), Patterns of Authority: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry, New York, Wiley.
  • Emerson, R.M. (1962), “Power Dependence Relations”, en American Sociological Review, núm. 27, pp. 31-40.
  • Etzioni, A. (1961), A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, New York, The Free Press.
  • Glagliardi, P. (1986), Le imprese come culture, Torino, Isedi.
  • Georgiuo, P. (1973), “The Goal Paradigm and Notes Toward a Counter Paradigm”, en Administrative Science Quarterly, núm. 18, pp. 291-310.
  • Gross, E. y Etzioni, A. (1985), Organization in Society, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
  • Gulik, L. y Urwich, L. (eds.) (1937), Papers on the Science of Administration, New York, Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University...
  • Halperin, M. (1974), Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy, Washington, The Brooking Institution.
  • Hickson, J. y Altri (1971), “Estrategic Contingencies, Theory of Intraorganization Power”, en Administrative Science Quarterly, num. 16, pp....
  • Kaufman, H. (1964), “Organization Theory and Political Theory”, en American Political Science Review, num. 58, pp. 5-14.
  • Keeley, M. (1980), “Organization Analogy: A Comparison of Organismic and Social Contract Models”, en Administrative Science Quarterly, num....
  • Lasswell, H.D. y Kaplan, A. (1950), Power and Society, A Framework for Political Inquiry, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  • March, J. y Simon, E. (1958), Organization, New York, Wiley.
  • Morgan, G. (1980), “Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory”, en Administrative Science Quarterly, num. 25, pp. 605-622.
  • Olsen, J. (1983), Organized Democracy, Bergen, Universites for Laget.
  • Palumbo, D. (1975), "Organization Theory and Political Science”, en Greenstein e Polsby (vol. 2, 319-369).
  • Panebianco, A. (1982), Modelli di partito. Potere e organizzazione nei partiti politici, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  • Passigli, S. (ed.) (1971), Potere e élites politiche, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  • Perrow, C. (1961), “The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organization”, en American Sociological Review, num. 26, pp. 854-866.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1973), The Politics of Organizal Decision Marking, London, Tavistock.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1981), Power in Organizations, Boston, Pitman.
  • Rainey, H. (1984), “Organization Theory and Political Science: Organizational Typologies, Political Variables, and Policy Studies”, en Policy...
  • Salaman, G. (1980), “Classification of Organizations and Organization Structure: The Main Elements and Interelationships”, en G. Salaman e...
  • Scott, R. (1981), Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice- Hall.
  • Selznick, P. 0957), Leadership in Administration, New York, Harper and Row.
  • Silverman, D. (1970), Sociology of Organizations, London, Heinemann.
  • Thompson, J. (1967), Organizational in Action, New York, McGraw, Hill.
  • Zald, M. (ed.) (1970), Power in Organizations, Nashville, Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Zan, S. (ed.) (1988), Logiche d’azione organizzativa, Bologna, Il Mulino.