Un diálogo sobre la ley y la protesta social

• Gargarella, Roberto ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

     Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

     Argentina

     
• Localización: Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 0251-3420, ISSN-e 2305-2546, Nº. 61, 2008, págs. 19-50
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.200801.001
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 5 Citas
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Badeni, G. (17 de mayo de 1999). Formas de libertinaje. Diario Clarín.
  • Badeni, G. (1999). Derecho Constitucional. Libertades y garantías. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.
  • Badeni. G. (2001). La convivencia democrática. La Ley. T. 2001-E.
  • Bork, R. (1979). The Impossibility of Finding Welfare Rights in the Constitution. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1979(3), 695-702.
  • Cassagne, J.C. (2002). Reflexiones sobre los “cacerolazos”. La Ley. T. 2002-C.
  • Cox, A. (1951). Strikes, picketing and the Constitution. Vanderbilt Law Review, 4(3) 574-602.
  • Dutertre, G. (2003). Key Case-Law Extracts. European Court of Human Rights. Strasburg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  • Easterbroock, F. (1992). Abstraction and Authority. University of Chicago Law Review, 59(1), 349-380. doi: 10.2307/1599940
  • Estlund, D. (2005). Democracy and the Real Speech Situation. IVR Conference. Granada, España.
  • Fenwick, H. (1999). The Right to Protest, the Human Rights Act and the Margin of Appreciation. Modern Law Review, 62(4), 491-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00220
  • Fung, A. (2005). Deliberation before the Revolution. Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political Theory, 33(2),...
  • Jones, E. (1953). Picketing and Coercion: A Jurisprudence of Epithets. Virginia Law Review, 39(8), 1023-1052. doi: 10.2307/1070228
  • Kalven, H. (1965). The Concept of the Public Forum: Cox vs. Louisiana. Supreme Court Review, 1965, 1-32. doi: 10.1086/scr.1965.3108783
  • Landwehr, H. (1993). Unfriendly Persuasion: Enjoining Picketing. Duke Law Journal, 43(1), 148-188. doi: 10.2307/1372749
  • La violencia piquetera. (11 de octubre de 2005). La Nación.
  • Mansbridge, J. (2005). Deliberation Everywhere. IVR Conference, Granada España.
  • Marshall, B. (1965). The Protest Movement and the Law. Virginia Law Review, 51(5), 785-803. doi: 10.2307/1071507
  • Moon, R. (1995). The Supreme Court of Canada on the Structure of Freedom of Expression Adjudication. University of Toronto Law Journal, 45(4),...
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Neill, K. (1999). Disentangling the Law of Public Protest. Loyola Law Review, 45(3), 411-526.
  • Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a Theory of Human Rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4), 315-356.
  • Scott, M. (1974). Picketing under the First Amendment. The Hastings Law Journal, 26.
  • Soberano, M. (2005). La protesta social: delito, derecho o deber. Mimeo.
  • Stone, G. (1974). Fora Americana: Speech in Public Places. Supreme Court Review, 1974, 233-280. doi: 10.1086/scr.1974.3108709
  • Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Nueva York: Oxford Press.
  • Young, I. (2001). Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670-690. doi: 10.1177/0090591701029005004
  • Zaffaroni, E. (2002). El derecho penal y la criminalización de la protesta social. Jurisprudencia Argentina, 4(7).
  • Adderley vs. Florida [1966] 385 U.S. 39 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Amalgamated Food Employees Local 590 vs. Logan Valley Plaza [1968] 391 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Brown vs. Louisiana [1996] 383 U.S. 131 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Cameron vs. Johnson [1968] 390 U.S. 611 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • C.H.A. [1991] (Corte Suprema de Justicia la Nación de Argentina).
  • Cox vs. Louisiana, [1965] 379 U.S. 536. (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Cox vs. New Hampshire [1941] 312 U.S. 569 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Creer vs. Spock [1976] 424 U.S. 828 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Burson vs. Freeman [1992] 504 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • FFC vs. Pacifica Found [1978] 438 U.S. 726 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Farmer vs. Moses [1964] 232 F. Supp. 154 (Southern District of New York).
  • Feiner vs. New York [1951] 340 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Food Employes Local 590 vs. Logan Plaza Valley [1968] 391 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Freedman vs. Maryland [1965] 380 U.S. 51 (Supreme Court of the United States].
  • Giboney vs. Empire Storage [1949] 336 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Grace vs. United States [1983] 461 U.S. 171 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Hague vs. Committee for Industrial Organization [1939a] 307 U.S. 501-508 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Hague, Mayor et al. vs. Committee for Industrial Organization et al. [1939] 307 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Hudgens vs. NLRB [1976] 424 U.S. 507 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Ikscon vs. Lee [1992] 112 S. Ct. 2701, 2718, 1992.
  • Julio Alberto Alais y otros c. Cámara Nacional de Casación Penal [recurso de casación], causa n°. 4859-04 (23 de abril de 2004).
  • Linmark Associates, Inc. vs. Township of Willingboro [1977] 431 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Lloyd Corp. vs. Tanner [1972] 407 U.S. 551 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Marina Schifrin c. Cámara Nacional de Casación Penal [recurso de casación], causa n°. 3905/02 (3 de julio de 2002).
  • Milk Wagon Drivers vs. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc. [1941] 312 U.S. 287 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • New Negro Alliance vs. Sanitary Grocery Co. [1938] 303 U.S. 552 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • New York Times vs. Sullivan [1964] 376 U.S. 254 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • NLRB vs. Fruit Packers [1964] 377 U.S. 58 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • People vs. Knight [1962] 35 Misc. 2d 216, 228 N. Y. S. ad 981 (Magis Ct. 1962) (Court of New York).
  • Pritchard vs. Downie [1964] 326 F. 2d. 323 (8° Cir.) (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit).
  • Rassemblement Jurassien Unité Jurassienne vs. Switzerland, 10 Eur. Ct. H.R. (1979).
  • Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union vs. Dolphin Delivery, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573 (Supreme Court of Canada).
  • Schneider vs. State [1939] 308 U.S. 147 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden vs. Bulgaria, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2001).
  • Steen vs. Tile Layers Protective Union [1937] 301 U.S. 468 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Students Against Apartheid Coalition vs. O’Neill [1987] 660 F. Supp. 333, 339 (Western District of Virginia).
  • Texas vs. Jonson [1989] 491 U.S. 397 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent Community School District [1969] 393 U.S. 503 (Supreme Court of the United States).
  • Thornhill vs. Alabama [1940] 310 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court of United States).
  • Williams vs. Wallace [1965] 240 F. Supp. 100, 104 (District Court, M.D. Alabama).