Acceso usuarios
Hannah Arendt�s Eichmann in Jerusalem ends with the repetition, and affirmation, of the court�s judgment on Eichmann. The article argues that this re-performance of the legal act of judgment follows precisely from the self-reflective problematization of legal judgment which Arendt�s book presents as the only way to do justice to the Eichmann case. Arendt�s Eichmann in Jerusalem should thus be read as an exploration of the paradox at the bottom of law.
