Semantic Parameters To Manage An Innovation Network Using Managing As Designing Approach: The Virtual Innovation Society Network Case

• Gattaz, Cristiane Chaves ^[2] ; Cruvinel, Paulo Estevão ^[3] ; Piscopo, Marcos Roberto ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidade Nove de Julho

     Universidade Nove de Julho

     Brasil

     
  2. [2] Embrapa Instrumentação - Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, São Carlos, SP
  3. [3] Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA), São Carlos-SP

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: International Journal of Innovation: IJI Journal, ISSN-e 2318-9975, Vol. 2, Nº. 1, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Spring), págs. 45-64
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.5585/iji.v2i1.8
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • The most recent operations and management frameworks in innovation have not been complete to explicit required knowledge to manage the cooperation of its networked open innovation value chain in the knowledge economy and open enterprise. Strategic actors from the Virtual Innovation Society network were interviewed to identify critical semantic parameters that address this issue. As a result, this study suggests the characterization of inter-dependent added-values and its performance metrics, under the “managing as designing” approach, as input for managing the externalities, the integration of the articulation between business operations, strategy and information technology, and waste of innovation. In this context, the identification of the main managerial indicators for future command and control of existing innovation network operations under the “managing as designing” approach becomes a new challenge for future research.  

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Amato Neto, J. (Org.). (2005). Redes entre organizações: Domínio do conhecimento e da eficácia operacional. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.
  • Andrade, M. S. (2004). Parcerias estratégicas em nanotecnologia: A experiência da Fundação Centro Tecnológico de Minas Gerais. Revista Parcerias...
  • Boland Jr., R.J. & Collopy, F. (2004). Managing as designing. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Boland Jr., R.J., Collopy, F., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. (2008).
  • Managing as designing: Lessons for organization leaders from the design practice of Frank O. Gehry. Design Issues, 24, pp. 10-25.
  • Boland Jr., R.J., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture,...
  • Organization Science, 18, pp. 632-647. Bubenko Jr., J.; Persson, A. & Stirna, J. (2001). EKD: User guide. Stockholm, Sweden: Kista, Dept....
  • Castells, M. (2007). A sociedade em rede. São Paulo, SP: Paz e Terra.
  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Conferência Internacional de Cidades Inovadoras, http://www.cici2010.org.br/, date of latest access: 24.03.2012.
  • Costa, L. F. (2005). Redes complexas: Modelagem simples da natureza. Ciência Hoje, 36, pp. 34-48.
  • De Moor, K., Berte, K., De Marez, L., Joseph, W., Deryckere, T. & Martens, L. (2010). User- driven innovation? Challenges of user involvement...
  • De Sordi, J. O. (2005). Gestão por processos: Uma abordagem da moderna administração. São Paulo, SP: Saraiva.
  • Di Serio, L. C. (Org.). (2009). Estratégia e competitividade empresarial: Inovação e criação de valor. São Paulo: Saraiva.
  • Fisser, S.; & Browaeys, M.J. (2010). Team learning on the edge of chaos. Learning Organization, 17, pp. 58-68.
  • Gattaz, C. C. (2001). Brincando de Processo: Um método de capacitação na metodologia de processo. Available in: . Accessed in March 1st 2012.
  • Gattaz, C. C. (2010). Um modelo de referência de formação e gestão de redes organizacionais: O caso do sistema de C,T&I do setor aeroespacial...
  • Gattaz Sobrinho, F. (2000). Processo: A máquina contextual nos negócios. Available in: . Accessed in March 1st 2012.
  • Gudas, S. (2009). Enterprise knowledge modelling: Domains and aspects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15, pp. 281-293.
  • Hakansson, H. & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Henneberg, S. C.; Naudé, P. & Mouzas, S. (2010). Sense-making and management in business networks: Some observations, considerations,...
  • Industrial Marketing Management, 39, pp. 355-360.
  • Herbert, S.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Humphrey, J. & Schmitz, H. (2001). Governance in global value chains. IDS Bulletin, 32, pp. 19-23.
  • Knobel, M. (2004). Nanoredes. Revista Parcerias Estratégicas, 18, pp. 99-105.
  • Matzler, K.; Bailom, F. & Mooradian, T.A. (2007). Intuitive decision making. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, pp. 13-15.
  • Martin, J.A. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2010). Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management...
  • Mitchell, M. (2006). Complex systems: Network thinking. Artificial Intelligence, 170, pp. 1194-1212.
  • Nash, J.F. (1950a). Non-cooperative games. PhD.-dissertation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
  • Nash, J.F. (1950b). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences USA., 36, pp. 48-49.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2008). Grand challenges for engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  • Nehme, C.C; Galvão, A.; Vaz, A.; Coelho, G. & Fellows Filho, L. (2009). Foresight: Proposta de uma metodologia visando ao fortalecimento...
  • Newman, M. E. J.; Barabási, A. L. & Watts, D. J. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C.K. & Rangaswami, M.R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review,...
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Policy responses to the economic crisis: Investing in innovation for long-term...
  • Pall, G. A. (2000). The process-centered enterprise: The power of commitments. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
  • Petroski, H. (2010). The essential engineer: Why science alone will not solve our global problems. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Polenske, K. R. (2004). Competition, collaboration and cooperation: An uneasy triangle in networks of firms and regions. Regional Studies,...
  • Reena, J. (2007). A chorus of voices is calling for an end to the hype and a focus on what really drives profitable innovation. Business Week,...
  • Ribeiro-Soriano, D. & Urbano, D. (2009). Overview of collaborative entrepreneurship: An integrated approach between business decisions...
  • Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focused stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, pp. 233-250.
  • Sacomano, M. & Truzzi, O.M.S. (2005). Governança e análise de redes. In Fusco, J.P.A (Ed.), Redes Produtivas e Cadeias de Fornecimento,...
  • Selig, P.M., Campos, L.M.S. & Lerípio, A.A. (2008). Gestão ambiental. In Batalha, M.O. (Ed.), Introdução à Engenharia de Produção, Campus...
  • Schouten, J. & Van Beers, W. (2008). Result-oriented management. West Bengal, India: Thema Publishing.
  • Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
  • Sull, D.N. & Spinosa, C. (2007). Promise-based management: The essence of execution. Harvard Business Review, 85, pp. 78-86, 141.
  • Teixeira, F. (Org.). (2005). Gestão de redes de cooperação interempresariais. Pituba, Salvador: Casa da Qualidade.
  • Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the world’s great manufacturer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
  • World Innovation Forum, June7-8, 2011 Executive Summary.
  • Yin, R. (2005). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e método. Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.