Acceso usuarios
Gillian H. MacIntosh
The constitutional settlement instituted by the Scottish Parliament in 1661�63 has traditionally been seen as a victory for the crown and a disaster for the parliamentary estates, since all of the hard-won constitutional gains introduced during the Covenanting era were largely swept away in favour of a complete reassertion of the king's prerogative powers. Nevertheless, despite the initial flourishing of royalist enthusiasm that marked the early Restoration period, in only a matter of years Scotland's political elites were once more engaged in battle with an authoritarian monarch and his increasingly dictatorial ministers of state. By as early as the mid-1660s, armed rebellion had erupted in the localities, religious non-conformity threatened to fragment the church, and rumbles of dissent within the parliamentary chamber itself were becoming more difficult to ignore. Can it be concluded, therefore, that it would prove impossible to imagine away the momentous events of the Covenanters' radical experiment in government, and that some of those constitutional and ideological principles survived into the Restoration era, effectively sowing the seeds of what would become the Revolution of 1689�90?
