Acceso usuarios
Naomi B. Rothman, Gregory B. Northcraft
This paper examines how one negotiator�s expressed emotional ambivalence can foster integrative outcomes. Study 1 demonstrated that observing a negotiation partner�s emotional ambivalence leads negotiators to come up with more integrative agreements. Study 2 examined a proposed mechanism: Expressed ambivalence leads to an increased perceived ability to influence the ambivalent negotiator because it suggests submissiveness. Study 3 demonstrated that perceived submissiveness mediates the effects of observed emotional ambivalence on integrative agreements. Implications of these findings for negotiation and emotions research, and directions for future research, are discussed.
