Acceso usuarios
James Owen
This article explores the role played by late-Victorian political associations during parliamentary election campaigns. The central hypothesis is that party organisation, known popularly as the �caucus�, is best understood as a rhetorical device used by politicians and the press to gain legitimacy in the new context created by an expanded and quasi-democratic electorate. The hypothesis is tested by examining the 1885 general election campaigns in Nottingham West and Sheffield Central. Both constituencies witnessed a triangular contest whereby an �additional� candidate, standing on a radical platform, entered the campaign and pursued a distinctly �anti-caucus� agenda that was aimed primarily at the local Liberal Party Association. The manner in which the �caucus� issue was articulated by all sides involved throws new light on the role played by party organisation during this period. While all sides described their association in a way that both defended and asserted its legitimacy, they equally used �anti-caucus� rhetoric to diminish the credibility of their opponent's organisation, even though they were emulating the deeds they were denouncing. Indeed, it was those within official Liberalism that indulged in the most virulent �anti-caucus� rhetoric. Thus, it is suggested that, with regard to the attitude of radicals towards official Liberalism, this �anti-caucus� rhetoric reflected not a real popular resistance against party organisation or �party�, but simply intense competition and imitation between rival �caucuses�.
