La enigmática persistencia de las teorías constitucionales basadas en el proceso

• Autores: Laurence H. Tribe
• Localización: Revista de derecho constitucional europeo, ISSN 1697-7890, Nº. 16 (Líneas temáticas de desarrollo del Derecho Constitucional Europeo (I)), 2011, págs. 441-470
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (htm)
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • G. GUNTHER, Contitutional Law, 1975.
  • L. LUSKY, By what right?, 1975.
  • BALL, “Judicial Protection of Powerless Minorities”, IOWA L. REV., núm. 59, 1974, p. 1059.
  • BLACK, “The Unfinished Business of the Warren Court”, WASH. L. REV., núm. 46, 1970, pp. 3, 8-9.
  • BREST, “The Supreme Court, 1975 Term-Foreword: In Defense of the Antidiscrimination Principle”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 90, 1976, pp. 1, 6-12.
  • FISS, “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause”, in M. COHEN, T. NAGEL y T. SCANLON (eds.), Equalityand preferential treatment, 1977, pp. 85,...
  • KARST, “The Supreme Court, 1976, Term-Foreword: Equal Citinzenship Under the Fourteenth Amendment”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 91, 1977, pp 1, 8-10,...
  • L. TRIBE, “Structural Due Process”, HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV., núm. 10, 1975, pp. 269.
  • NOTE, “Mental Ilness: A Suspect Classification?”, YALE L.J., núm. 83, 1974, p. 1237.
  • ROSTOW, “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 66, 1952, p. 193.
  • J. ELY, Democracy and Distrut, 1980.
  • B. BAILYN, Tue ideological origins of the American Revolution, 1967.
  • NOTE, “TheThirteenthAmendment and PrivateAffirmativeAction”, YALE L.J., núm. 89, 1979, pp. 399, 406.
  • B. ACKERMAN, Private property and the Constitution, 1977.
  • KENNEDY, “The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries”, BUFFALO L. REV., núm. 28, 1979, p. 205.
  • MILLER, “The Forest of Due Process of Law: The American Constitutional Tradition”, en J. PENNOCK y J. CHAPMAN (eds.), Due process: Nomos XVIII,...
  • T. COOLEY, ConstitutionalLimitations, 1903, 7ª ed., pp. 500-75.
  • L. TRIBE, American ConstitutionalLaw, 1978, pp. 434-36.
  • WOOD, “Rhetoric and Reality in the American Revolution”, WM. & MARY Q., núm. 23, 3d Ser. 1966, p. 3.
  • G. WOOD, The creation of the Amercian Republic, 1969, pp. 503-04.
  • L. TRIBE, “PerspectivesonBakke: EqualProtection, Procedural Fairness, orStructuralJustice?”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 92, 1979, pp. 864, 867.
  • PACKER, “Twomodels of the Criminal Process”, U. PA. L. REV., núm. 113, 1964, pp. 1, 6-23.
  • C. FRIED, AnAnatomy of Values, 1970, pp. 125-32.
  • MICHELMAN, “Formal and AssociationalAims in Procedural DueProcess”, in JJ. PENNOCK y J. CHAPMAN (eds.), Due process: Nomos XVIII.
  • SAPHIRE, “SpecifyingDueProcessValues: Toward a More ResponsiveApproachto Procedural Protection”, U. PA. L. REV., núm. 127, III, 1978, pp....
  • NOTE, “SpecifyingtheProceduresRequiredbyDueProcess: TowardLimitsonthe Use of InterestBalancing”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 88, 1975, pp. 1510, 1528-30.
  • ROSBERG, “Aliens and EqualProtection: WhyNottheRightto Vote?”, MICH. L. REV., núm. 75, 1977, p. 1092.
  • “Developments in the Law-The Constitution and the Family”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 93, 1980, pp. 1156, 1201-02, 1221-42, 1350-83.
  • R. DWORKIN, Taking Rights Seriously, 1977, p. 273.
  • J. ELY, “TheChief”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 88, 1974, pp. 11, 12.
  • FISS, “TheSupremeCourt, 1973 Term-Foreword: TheForms of Justice”, HARV. L. REV., núm. 93, 1979, pp. 1, 8.
  • M. FOUCAULT, The Order of Things, 1970, p. XV.
  • W. JORDAN, White over Black, 1968.
  • C. V. WOODWARD, The strange career of Jim Crow2d ed., 1966.
  • G. WEINBERG, Society and theHealthy Homosexual, 1972, pp. 74-82.
  • A. HIRSCHMAN, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, 1970, pp. 108-12.
  • G. MYRDAL, An American Dilemma, 1944, pp. 27-30.
  • J. ELY, “The Constitutionality of Reverse Racial Discrimination”, U. CHI. L. REV., núm. 41, 1974, pp. 723, 732.
  • RIVERA, “Our Straight-Laced Judges: The Legal Position of Homosexual Persons in the United States”, HASTINGS L. J., núm. 30, 1979, p. 799.
  • G. REICH, TheSorcererof BolinasReef, 1976, pp. 71-73.
  • L. HUMPHREYS, Outthe Closets, 1972.
  • Doe v. Commonwealth'sAttorneyfor City of Richmond, 403 F. Supp. 1199, 1202.
  • BARRETT, “Legal Homophobia and the Christian Church”, HASTINGS L. J., núm. 30, 1979, p. 1019.
  • KARST, “The Freedom of Intimate Association”, YALE L. J., núm. 89, 1980, pp. 624, 633-35.
  • E. PAGELS, TheGnosticGospels, 1979.
  • A. KELLY, Eleanor of Aquitaine and theFour Kings, 1950.
  • A. MEIKLEJOHN, Free Speechanditsrelation to self-government, 1948.
  • YUDOF, “When Governments Speak: Toward A Theory of Government Expression and the First Amendment”, TEX. L. REV., núm. 57, 1979, p. 863.
  • LINDE, “Clear and Present Danger” Reexamined: Dissonance in the Brandenburg Concerto”, STAN. L. REV., núm. 22, 1970, p. 1163.
  • LINDE, “Due Process of Lawmaking”, NEB. L. REV., núm. 55, 1976, p. 197.
  • H. PITKIN, The concept of Representation, 1967.