The Role of Argumentation Schemes in Writing Argumentative Texts

• Autores: Begoña Carrascal Platas, Miguel Mori Igoa
• Localización: Revista iberoamericana de argumentación, ISSN-e 2172-8801, Nº. 3, 2011, págs. 1-15
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anscombre, J. C. and O. Ducrot (1983). L'Argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
  • Blair, J.A. (2001). “Walton’s Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development”. Argumentation 15, 365-379.
  • Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NewJersey: LEA.
  • Eemeren, F.H van. and R. Grootendorst (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectic-approach. Cambridge: Cambridge...
  • Dijk, T.A. van and W. Kintsch (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. London: Academic Press Inc.
  • Garssen, B. (2001). “Argument Schemes”. In: F.H van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp. 81-99), Amsterdam: Amsterdam...
  • Garssen, B. (2009). “Comparing the Incomparable: Figurative Analogies in a Dialectical Testing Procedure”. In: F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen...
  • Golder, C. (1996). Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Laussane: Delachaux et Niestlé.
  • Golder C. and P. Coirier (1984). “Argumentative text writing: developmental trends”. Discourse processes 18, 187-210
  • Golder, C and D. Pouit (2000). “For a debate to take place the topic must be debatable. Developmental evolution of the negotiation and debatability...
  • Hatcher, D.L. (1999). “Why critical thinking should be combined with written composition?”Informal Logic 19, n. 2&3, 171-183
  • Hastings, A. C. (1963). A reformulation of the modes of reasoning on argumentation. PH.D.dissertation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern...
  • Igland, M. (2009). “Negotiating Problems of Written Argumentation”. Argumentation 23, 495-511.
  • Jacobs, S. (2000). “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics”. Argumentation 14, 261-286
  • Jackson, S. (2008). “Predicaments of politicization in the debate over abstinence-only sex education”. In F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen...
  • Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pb.
  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Katzav, J.R. and C.A. Reed (2004). “On argumentation schemes and the natural classificationof arguments”. Argumentation 18, 239-259.
  • Kellogg, R.T. (1994). The Psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kienpointner, M. (1992). Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmunstern.Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog.
  • Kraus, M. (2007). “From Figure to Argument: Contrarium in Roman Rhetoric”. Argumentation 21, 3-19.
  • Leff, M. (2002). “The Relation between Dialectic and Rhetoric in a Classical and a Modern Perspective”. In: F.H. van Eemereen and P. Houtlosser...
  • Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958). Traité de l'Argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique.Paris: P.U.F.
  • Rigotti, E. (2009). “Whether and How Classical Topics can be Revived Within Contemporary Argumentation Theory”. In: F.H. van Eemeeren and...
  • Rubinelli, S. (2009). Ars Topica. The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Dordrecht:...
  • Mercier, H. and D. Sperber (2011). “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory”. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 34,...
  • Schwarz, B.B. and G.A. Gassner (2003). “The blind and the paralytic: fostering argumentation in social and scientific issues”. In: J. Andriessen,...
  • Tindale, Ch. (2004). Rhetorical Argumentation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Walton, D. (1996). Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Walton, D., Ch. Reed and F. Macagno (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.