Reductio ad Absurdum en la argumentación filosófica

• Autores: Gustavo Arroyo
• Localización: Revista iberoamericana de argumentación, ISSN-e 2172-8801, Nº. 1, 2010, págs. 81-104
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Audi, R. (Ed.) (1999) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ayer, A. (2001). Language, Truth and Logic, London: Penguin Books.
  • Bieri, P. (2001). Das Handwerk der Freiheit, Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag.
  • Cansen, H. (2005). “The informal Use of Reductio ad Absurdum”, in D. Hitchcock & D. Farr (Eds.), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of...
  • Cornman, J. (1962). “The identity of mind and body”, The journal of philosophy, 59, 489-492.
  • DeRose, K. (1995). “Solving the Skeptical Problem”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 104 (1), 1-52.
  • Dretske, Fred (1970). “Epistemic Operators,” The Journal of Philosophy, 67, 1007-1023.
  • Finocchiaro, M. (1987). “Six Types of Fallaciousness: Toward a Realistic Theory of Logical Criticism”. Argumentation, 12, 263-282.
  • Foulkes, P. (1973). “The Form of Reductio ad Absurdum”, Mind, vol 82 (328), 579-580.
  • Galileo Galilei (1994). Diálogo sobre los dos máximos sistemas del mundo ptolemaico y copernicano. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Hardy, G. H. (2004). A Mathematician ́s Apology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hartnack, J. (1972). “On Thinking”, Mind, vol. 81, No. 324, 543-552.
  • Hetherington, S. (2002). “Fallibilism and Knowing That One Is Not Dreaming”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 32, 83-102.
  • Hempel, C.G. (1982). Filosofía de la Ciencia Natural, Madrid: Alianza.
  • Jacquette, D. (2008). “Mathematical Proof and Discovery Reductio ad Absurdum”, Informal Logic, vol. 28 (3), pp. 242-261.
  • Jansen, H. (2007). “Refuting a Standpoint by appealing to its Outcomes: Reductio ad Absurdumvs. Argument from Consequences” , Informal Logic,...
  • Kenny, A. (1995). Frege. Londres: Penguin Books
  • Kneale, W. & M. Kneale (1962). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Kuhn, T. (1981). La Revolución Copernicana, Barcelona, Ariel.
  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of scientific research programmes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyons, W. (1980). Gilbert Ryle: An Introduction to his Philosophy, Brighton: The Harvester Press.
  • Machan, T. (2000) Initiative: Human agency and society, Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
  • Martinich, A. (2005). Philosophical Writing: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Mill, J. S. (1874). A System of Logic. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • Moya, C. (1998). “Boghossian's Reductio of Compatibilism”, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 9, 243-251.
  • Nozick, Robert (1981). Philosophical Explanations, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Passmore, J. (1961). Philosophical Reasoning, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  • Platón (1993). Diálogos, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Ryle, G. (1971). “Philosophical Arguments”, in Ryle, G., Collected Papers: volume II, New York: Barnes and Noble.
  • Ryle, G. (1984). The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rescher, N. (2002). “Reductio ad Absurdum”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/r/reductio.htm.
  • Salmon, W. (ed.) (1971). Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevante, Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.
  • Smart, J. J. C. (1959). “Sensations and Brain Processes”. Philosophical Review, 58 (2), 141-156.
  • Scherer, D. (1971). “The Form of Reductio ad Absurdum”, Mind, vol. 80, 247-252.
  • Schwed, M. (1999). “What makes the Reductio ad Absurdum an Important Tool for Rationality?”, in F.H. van Esmeren,...
  • Tetens, H. (2004). Philosophisches Argumentieren. München: Verlag C. H. Beck
  • Tindale, W. and J. Cough (1987). “The Use of Irony in Argumentation”, Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 20 (1), 1-17.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1988). Investigaciones Filosóficas, México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas UNAM.