Sobre el concepto de función en biología

• Autores: Andrés Luis Jaume Rodríguez
• Localización: Contrastes: revista internacional de filosofía, ISSN-e 2659-921X, ISSN 1136-4076, Nº 16, 2011, págs. 229-247
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ALLEN, BEKOFF Y LAUDER G. (eds.) 1998: Nature’s Purposes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
  • ARIEW, A. CUMMINS, R. Y PERLMAN, M. 2002: Functions. New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • BEDAU, M. 1992a: «Where’s the Good in Teleology?», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LII (4), 781-906.
  • BEDAU, M. 1992b: «Goal-Directed Systems and the Good», The Monist, 75, pp.34-49.
  • BIGELOW, J. Y PARGETTER, R. 1987: «Functions», Journal of Philosophy, 84, pp.181-196.
  • BOORSE, C. 1976: «Wright on Functions», The Philosophical Review, 85 (1), 70-86.
  • BULLER, D. 1998: «Etiological Theories of Function: A Geographical Survey», Biology and Philosophy 13, pp. 505-527.
  • BULLER, D. J. 1999: Function, Selection and Design. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • CHRISTENSEN, W. D. y BICKHARD, M. H. 2002: «The Process Dynamics of Normative Function», The Monist, 85, 1, pp. 3-28.
  • CUMMINS, R. 1975: «Functional Analysis», Journal of Philosophy, 72, pp. 741-765.
  • CUMMINS, R. 2002: «Neo- Teleology», en Ariew, A. Cummins, R. y Perlman, M. (eds.), Functions. New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and...
  • DAVIES. P. S. 2001: Norms of Nature. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
  • EDIN, B. B. 2008: «Assigning biological functions: making sense of causal chains», Synthese, 161, pp.203-218.
  • GLENNAN, S. 2002: «Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation», Philosophy of Science, 69, pp.S342-S353.
  • GODFREY-SMITH, P. 1993: «Functions: Consensus without unity», Pacific Philosophical Quaterly 74, pp. 196-208.
  • GODFREY-SMITH, P. 1994: «A modern history theory of functions», Noûs, 28, pp. 344-362.
  • GOULD, S.J. y LEWONTIN, R. C. 1979: «The Spandrels of san Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme»,...
  • GOULD, S. J. y VRBA, E. 1982: «Exaptation-a mising term in the science of form», Paleobiology, 8(1), pp.4-15.
  • GRIFITHS, P. E. 1993: «Funtional Analysisis and proper functions», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, pp. 409-422.
  • HEMPEL, C. y OPPENHEIM, P. 1948: «Studies in the Logic of Explanation» Philosophy of Science 15, pp. 135-175.
  • HEMPEL, C. 1996: La explicación científica. Barcelona: Paidós. [1965].
  • MACHAMER, P., DARDEN, L., CRAVER, C. F. 2000: «Thinking about Mechanisms», Philosophy of Science, 67, pp.1-25.
  • MCLAUGHLIN, P. 2001: What Functions Explain. Functional Explanation and Selfreproducing Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MILLIKAN, R. G. 1984: Language Thought and Other Bological Categories. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
  • MILLIKAN, R. G. 1989: «In defense of proper functions», Philosophy of Science 56, pp. 288-302.
  • NAGEL, E. 2006: La estructura de la ciencia. Barcelona: Paidós [1961].
  • NEANDER, K. 1991a: «The Teleological Notion of Function», The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69, pp. 454-468.
  • NEANDER, K. 1991b: «Functions as selected effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s defense», Philosophy of Science, 58, pp.168-84.
  • SOBER, E. 1984: The Nature of Selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • TINBERGEN, N. 1963: «On the aims and methods of ethology», Zetschrift fúr Tierpsychologie 27, pp. 1-32.
  • VAN FRAASSEN 1980: The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • WALSH, D. M. 1996: «Fitness and Function», The British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 47(4), pp. 553-574.
  • WALSH, D.M. Y ARIEW, A. 1996: «A Taxonomy of Functions», Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4, pp. 493-514.
  • WRIGHT, L. 1973: «Functions», Philosophical Review, 82, pp. 139-168