Human needs as the foundation of legal regulation: Concept, essence, classification, and related terminology

• Anna Nakonechna ^[1]
  1. [1] Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
• Localización: Cadernos de dereito actual, ISSN-e 2386-5229, ISSN 2340-860X, Nº. 32, 2026, págs. 336-363
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The purpose of the article is to explain how needs-related conditions acquire legal relevance within selected European judicial reasoning without being transformed into autonomous subjective rights. The study was conducted in 2024–2025 as a doctrinal and interpretative legal inquiry focused on selected case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. International human rights instruments and the Constitution of Ukraine were used only as contextual normative materials for clarifying the legal categories applied in the examined judicial reasoning. The case-law sample consisted of eight purposively selected decisions: five ECtHR cases and three CJEU cases. The research shows that a need, in the limited doctrinal sense used in this article, may be understood as an objectively significant condition of existence, agency, or participation that becomes legally relevant only through recognized legal forms, including dignity, rights, guarantees, state obligations, vulnerability assessment, minimum standards of protection, and judicial review criteria. The article distinguishes need, interest, value, dignity, and vulnerability as related but non-identical categories with different legal functions. It also develops a limited functional typology of protected conditions reconstructed from the examined materials: existential, socio-economic, autonomy-related, equality and inclusion-related, and protective needs. The analysis identifies five analytical forms of legal transformation observed within the selected sample: axiological, normative, threshold-based, interpretive, and institutional. The selected ECtHR cases mainly show dignity-related threshold reasoning, while the selected CJEU cases more often reveal the role of equality, citizenship, participation, and proportionality. The findings demonstrate that needs-related conditions matter in the examined materials as mediated legal criteria, not as direct sources of law. Therefore, the results should be read as a focused doctrinal reconstruction of selected European judicial patterns rather than as a comprehensive theory of human needs in law.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ALEXY, R. A theory of constitutional rights (J. Rivers, Trans.). Oxford University Press. 2002. Available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/a-theory-of-constitutional-rights-9780199584239...
  • BOYLE, K.; CAMPS, D.; ENGLISH, K.; FERRIE, J. “The international human rights framework for economic, social and cultural rights”, in Access...
  • CASE OF M.S.S. v. BELGIUM AND GREECE. Application no. 30696/09, Judgment of 21 January 2011, European Court of Human Rights. Available at:...
  • CASE OF MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (No. 2). Applications nos. 41138/98 & 64320/01, Judgment of 12 July 2005, European Court of Human...
  • CASE OF PRETTY v. UNITED KINGDOM. Application no. 2346/02, Judgment of 29 April 2002, European Court of Human Rights. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60448...
  • CHEPIK-TREHUBENKO, O.; CHERNOBUK, V. “Social and economic rights of citizens in Ukraine: Regarding the issue of ensuring in a state of war”,...
  • COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf...
  • COUNCIL OF EUROPE. European Social Charter (Revised), 1996. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-social-charter/the-revised-european-social-charter...
  • CRESSWELL RIOL, K.; CONNELLY, S. “Human dignity as a lens and framing of food charity”, Geography Compass, 19(12), 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.70054
  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I.A theory of human need. Macmillan. 1991. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-349-21500-3...
  • DWORKIN, R. Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press. 1977. Available at: https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674867116 (accessed...
  • EDEJI, O. C. “Intersections of the right to education and human dignity in international human rights law: A purpose-based analysis”, Laws,...
  • ELVER, H. “Right to food”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 36(4), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-023-09916-8
  • GLASMAN, J. “Humanitarianism and the quantification of human needs: Minimal humanity by Joël Glasman”, International Review of the Red Cross,...
  • JAMES, C. “Food, dignity, and the European Court of Human Rights”, Legal Studies, 44(3), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.34
  • JAMES, C. “The role of dignity in rights-based food policy in the UK”, King’s Law Journal, 36(2), 2025, pp. 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2025.2546654
  • KHALABUDENKO, O. A. “The right to adequate housing: Its legal nature and possible ways of implementation”, International Scientific Journal...
  • KRON, A. “At the frontlines of implementing the right to a healthy environment”, International Review of the Red Cross, 105(924), 2023. Available...
  • KÜCÜKDEVECI v. SWEDEX GMBH & CO. KG. Case C-555/07, Judgment of 19 January 2010, Court of Justice of the European Union. Available at:...
  • LARIOSHINA v. RUSSIA. Application no. 56869/00, Decision of 23 April 2002, European Court of Human Rights. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-181155%22]}...
  • MANTU, S. “When equal treatment is not enough: Human dignity for migrant EU citizens”, European Papers, 3(2), 2018, pp. 885–908. Available...
  • MCCRUDDEN, C. “Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights”, European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 2008, pp. 655–724....
  • MORIAYASU, C. et al. “Realizing the right to education for all: Approaches to removing barriers based on gender, disability, and socioeconomic...
  • MORRIS, K. “Vulnerability, care ethics and socioeconomic rights”, Human Rights Law Review, 23(4), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad028
  • NUSSBAUM, M. C. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 2006. Available...
  • O’CONNELL, P. “Socio-economic rights redux”, King’s Law Journal, 36(2), 2025, pp. 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2025.2567047
  • QUINTIA PASTRANA, A.; VOLS, M. “Tracing the right to access to housing: Insights from human rights theory and practice”, European Journal...
  • RAWLS, J. A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1999. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvkjb25m...
  • RUIZ ZAMBRANO v. OFFICE NATIONAL DE L’EMPLOI (ONEm). Case C-34/09, Judgment of 8 March 2011, Court of Justice of the European Union. Available...
  • Sen, A. Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf. 1999. Available at: https://raggeduniversity.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/1_x_senDevelopmentasFreedom-_compressed.pdf...
  • TIGCHELAAR, J.; OUDE BREUIL, B. “No-bodies human rights. An interdisciplinary exploration of bodies in human rights”, Utrecht Law Review,...
  • UNITED NATIONS. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights...
  • UNITED NATIONS. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights...
  • UVAROVA, O.; BERNAZ, N. “Heightened human-rights due diligence as risk governance: Food-retail supply chains in wartime Ukraine”, European...
  • VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Constitution of Ukraine, 1996. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 (accessed on 15 March...
  • WILLETS, L.; FLEMING, L. E.; MORGERA, E. “Biodiversity, health science, and the human right to a healthy environment”, The Lancet Planetary...
  • ZHENG, Z. “The right to an adequate standard of living”, in The legal issues of the emerging rights, Springer, 2024, pp. 287–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0499-6_9