Duties Towards Oneself and Self-Regarding Actions in the System of Reciprocal Duties

• Autores: Alexander P. Espinoza Rausseo, Jhenny F. Rivas Alberti
• Localización: Mexican Law Review, ISSN 1870-0578, ISSN-e 2448-5306, Vol. 18, Nº. 2, 2026
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.22201/iij.24485306e.2026.2.20548
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In this article, we aim to examine the relationship between behaviors that are exclusively governed by internal legislation and those that are also subject to external legislation. The former are governed exclusively by prima facie duties towards oneself, while the latter establish the scope of prima facie duties towards others. We propose that the sphere of duties towards oneself serves as the basis for the entire system of reciprocal duties. The self-determination of the individual constitutes the cornerstone of a system of duties and rights across various levels or corresponding to the individual, social, and public spheres. Duties towards oneself allow for the evaluation of options in the cognitive process of self-regulation of the individual. From those premises, rational individuals can determine their own ends and exercise free will. This internal process is expressed in the world of the senses through behavior, which may include acts relating to oneself in the private sphere or acts relating to others in the social and public spheres. Therefore, their effects are not limited to the internal sphere but are part of complex reciprocal relationships.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Adela Cortina Orts, Preliminary study, in Immanuel Kant, La metafísica de las costumbres, at XXXIX (A. Cortina & J. Conill trans., Tecnos,...
  • Albrecht Randelzhofer, Die Pflichtenlehre bei Samuel von Pufendorf: Festvortrag gehalten am 2. Dezember 1982 im Kammergericht aus Anlass der...
  • Alexander P. Espinoza Rausseo & Jhenny de Fátima Rivas Alberti, La triple dimensión de los derechos fundamentales y la doctrina del foro...
  • Alf Ross, On Law and Justice 198 (Oxford University Press, 2019).
  • Arthur Ripstein, Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy 109 (Harvard University Press, 2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054516
  • Ben Saunders, Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle, 125 Mind 1005, 1024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv171
  • Bernard E. Harcourt, The Collapse of the Harm Principle, 90 J. Crim. L. & Criminology (1973-) 109 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/1144164...
  • Bernard E. Harcourt, The Collapse of the Harm Principle Redux: On Same-Sex Marriage, the Supreme Court’s Opinion in United States v. Windsor,...
  • Bert Heinrichs, Single-Principle Versus Multi-Principles Approaches in Bioethics, 27 J. Applied Phil. 72, 73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00474.x...
  • BVerfGE 6, 389/437 – Homosexuelle, available at https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv006389.html.
  • BVerfGE 23, 98/106 – Ausbürgerung I, available at https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv023098.html.
  • BVerfGE 90, 145/187 – Cannabis, available at https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv090145.html.
  • BVerfGE 90, 145/193 – Cannabis, available at https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv090145.html.
  • BVerfGE 153, 182 (263-264) – Suizidhilfe, available at https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv153182.html.
  • BVerfGE 120, 224 – Geschwisterbeischlaf, available at https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv120224.html#Rn122.
  • Carl Wellman, An approach to rights: studies in the philosophy of law and morals 2 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1997).
  • Carl Wellman, Real rights 183 (Oxford University Press, 1995). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195095005.001.0001
  • Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dep’t of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 262 (1990), available at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/497/261/.
  • Daniel Eggers, Die Naturzustandstheorie des Thomas Hobbes: Eine vergleichende Analyse von|‘The Elements of Law‘, ‚De Cive‘und den englischen...
  • David Phillips, Rossian Ethics: W. D. Ross and Contemporary Moral Theory 37 (Oxford University Press, 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190602185.001.0001
  • David Ross, The Right and the Good 28 (Oxford University Press, 2003) (1930).
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 404 (1856), available at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/60/393/.
  • Ernesto Garzón Valdés, ¿Es éticamente justificable el paternalismo jurídico?, 5 Doxa 155 (1988). https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA1988.5.08 DOI:...
  • Friedrich Carl von Savigny, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts: Bd. 1 24 (Veit und comp., 1840).
  • Friedrich Carl von Savigny, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts: Bd. 8 201 (Veit und comp., 1849).
  • Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts: Oder, Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse mit Hegels eigenhändigen...
  • Gerald Dworkin, Paternalism, 56 The Monist 64, 79 (1972). http://www.jstor.org/stable/27902250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197256119
  • Gregory S. Alexander & Eduardo M. Peñalver, Introduction to Property Theory 76 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978548
  • Hans Welzel, Die Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs: Ein Beitrag Zur Ideengeschichte des, 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts 6 (Walter de Gruyter, 2012).
  • Hannah Arendt, Reflections on Little Rock, 6 Dissent 45, 56 (1959). https://www.normfriesen.info/forgotten/little_rock1.pdf.
  • H. L. A. Hart, Are There Any Natural Rights?, 64 Phil. Rev. 175, 188 (1955). https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586
  • H. L. A. Hart, Law, liberty, and morality 22 (Stanford University Press, 1963). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620612
  • H. L. A. Hart, Legal rights, in Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and political philosophy 168, 178 (OUP Oxford, 1982). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254683.003.0008
  • Immanuel Kant, Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, in Kant`s gesammelte Schriften 230 (hg. von der...
  • Immanuel Kant, Grundlegung zur metaphysik der sitten, in Kant`s gesammelte Schriften 429 (hg. von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der...
  • Immanuel Kant, Immanuel Kants Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen 113 (Königsberg, Bey Friedrich Nicolovius, 1800).
  • Immanuel Kant, Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, in Kant`s gesammelte Schriften...
  • Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), available at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/.
  • James Otis Rodner Smith, Felicity Ann Rodner & Ana Valentina Lameda, Law and Justice in William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice,...
  • Jens Timmermann, Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant’s Ethical Theory, 95 Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 36, 47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2013-0002...
  • Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation 323 (Clarendon Press, 1907) (1823).
  • Joel Feinberg, Duties, Rights, and Claims, 3 Am. Phil. Q. 137, 139 (1966). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009200
  • Joel Feinberg, Harm to Self: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law 41 (Oxford University Press, 1989). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195059239.001.0001
  • Joel Feinberg & J. Narveson, The nature and value of rights, 4 J. Value Inquiry 243, 249 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00137935 DOI:...
  • John Rawls, Justice as fairness: A restatement 120 (Harvard University Press, 2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
  • John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Stefan Collini Ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012) (1859).
  • John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, in Utilitarianism and on liberty: Including Mill’s’ Essay on Bentham and selections from the writings of...
  • Johann Gotilieb Fichte, Rechtslehre: vorgetragen von Ostern bis Michaelis 1812 7 (Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980).
  • Johann Gotilieb Fichte, System der Sittenlehre nach den Principien der Wissenschaftslehre, in Sämmtliche werke 300 (Vol. 10) (Veit und comp.,...
  • Joseph Raz, Rights and Individual Well-Being, in Ethics in the Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics 57, 58 (Clarendon...
  • Joseph William Singer, The legal rights debate in analytical jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld, Wis. L. Rev. 975, 993 (1982).
  • J. Raz, Legal Rights, 4 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 1, 20 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/4.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/4.1.1
  • Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats 481 (Suhrkamp, 1996).
  • Lara Denis, Kant’s Ethics and Duties to Oneself, 78 Pac. Phil. Q. 321, 335 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00042
  • Marcus G. Singer, On Duties to Oneself, 69 Ethics 202 (1959). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2379349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/291210
  • Marietta Auer, Subjektive Rechte bei Pufendorf und Kant: Eine Analyse im Lichte der Rechtskritik Hohfelds, 208 Archiv Für Die Civilistische...
  • Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), available at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/326/501/.
  • Mary Gregor, Laws of Freedom 59 (Blackwell, 1963). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674188761.c6
  • Matthew H. Kramer, Rights Without Trimmings, in A debate over rights: philosophical Inquiries 59 (Oxford University Press, 2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0002
  • Michael Seidler, Introductory essay, in Samuel Pufendorf’s On the natural state of men: The 1678 Latin edition and English translation 22...
  • Monsieur Lazhar (Falardeau, P. Dir., Canadá: Aceprensa, 2011).
  • Niklas Luhmann, Das Recht der Gesellschaft 222 (Suhrkamp,1993).
  • Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, 250 (1963), available at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/373/244/.
  • Richard A. Posner, Law and Commerce in The Merchant of Venice, in Shylock on Trial: The Appellate Briefs 8 (University of Chicago Press, 2013)....
  • Richard McCarty, Moral Conflicts in Kantian Ethics, 8 History of Philosophy Quarterly 65 (1991). http://www.jstor.org/stable/27743963
  • Robert Alexy, Kant’s Non-Positivistic Concept of Law, 24 Kantian Review 503 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415419000281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415419000281
  • Robert Alexy, Theorie der Grundrechte 327 (Suhrkamp, 1985).
  • Roscoe Pound, A Survey of Social Interests, 57 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 2 (1943). https://doi.org/10.2307/1334970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1334970
  • Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976), available at https://supreme.justia.com/ca-ses/federal/us/427/160/.
  • Sam. L. B. A Puffendorf, De Jure Naturae et Gentium: Libri octo (Buch 1) 541 (Ex Officina Knochiana, 1744) (1672).
  • Samuel Pufendorf, Officia Hominis & Civis, in Samuel Pufendorf, Gesammelte Werke 133 (Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann ed., Band 2, 1997) (1673).
  • Samuel Pufendorf, On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law [De officio hominis et civis] 111 (James Tully ed., Michael Silverthorne...
  • Samuel Pufendorf, On the natural state of men, in Samuel Pufendorf’s ‘On the Natural State of Men’. The 1678 Latin Edition and English Translation...
  • Samuel Pufendorf, The whole duty of man according to the law of nature 56 (R. Gosling, 1735).
  • Samuel Pufendorf, Vorrede des Herrn von Pufendorff, in Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 2. De officio 101 (Gerald Hartung Hrsg., Akad. Verl, 1997) (1673).
  • STC 19/2023, FJ 6 C) b) (i), available at https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/29280.
  • Stephen Darwall, Introduction, in Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in second-personal ethics I, XIII (Oxford University Press, 2013)....
  • Stephen Darwall, Moral Obligation: Form and Substance, in Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in second-personal ethics 40, 47 (Oxford University...
  • Tim Stretton, Contract, debt litigation and Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, 31 Adelaide Law Review 111 (2010). https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/2010/7.pdf#page=10.00
  • T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other 65 (Harvard University Press, 2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv134vmrn
  • Th. Niemeyer, The Judgment against Shylock in the Merchant of Venice, 14 Mich. L. Rev. 20, 30 (1915). https://doi.org/10.2307/1276185 DOI:...
  • Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan 190 (Ch. 13) (Noel Malcolm ed., Clarendon Press, 2012) (1651). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00025178
  • Thomas Hobbes, Leviatán o la invención moderna de la razón 222 (Cap. XIII) (Editora Nacional, 1979) (1651).
  • Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childless, Principles of Biomedical Ethics 371 (Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 2001).
  • Vertical Limit (O’Donnell, C., Paxton, B., & Campbell, M. Dir., Marmot Library Network, 2000), available at https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b2623208x?searchId=711715074&recordIndex=4&page=1.
  • W. David Ross, Foundations of ethics: The Gifford Lectures delivered in the University of Aberdeen, 1945-6 88 (Oxford at the Clarendon Press,...
  • Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 26 Yale L. J. 710, 733 (1917). https://doi.org/10.2307/786270...
  • Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 23 Yale L. J. 16, 36 (1913). https://doi.org/10.2307/785533...
  • Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Sphere and Duties of Government 20 [Chap. 3 par. 1] (Coulthard Joseph trans., ed., John Chapman 1854) (1791).