The representation of complex diversity in upper chambers: comparative study of Ethiopia, Iran and Turkey

• Ender Akyol ^[1] ; Yasin Yimam Mohammed ^[2] ; Azam Ahmadi ^[1]
  1. [1] Inonu University

     Inonu University

     Turquía

     
  2. [2] Debre Tabor University, Debre, Tabor,Ethiopia
• Localización: The Journal of legislative studies, ISSN 1357-2334, Vol. 32, Nº. 1, 2026, págs. 158-175
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This paper explains the creation and use of upper chamber in addressing the problem of representation. Ethiopia, Turkey and Iran are chosen for this comparative analysis because they are similar in terms of diversity. The issue of representation in both lower and upper chambers is an agenda of representative democracy. In fact, the role and necessity for the upper chamber varies country to country. Countries like UK, the USA, India, Russia and Ethiopia are the premier examples of a bicameral parliament whereas Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Israel and Turkey (since 1982) are examples of unicameral. Functionally, ensuring the geographical representation of diverse interests and interpreting the constitution. Usually, the upper chamber is appointed and this leads to lack of direct responsibility and accountability to the people whom they represent. This paper examines the role of the upper chamber in Ethiopia (1991–2015), Iran (until 1979 Islamic Revolution) and Turkey (1961–1980).

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abrahamian, E. (2008). A history of modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ahmad, F. (2003). Turkey: The quest for identity. One world Publications.
  • Association of European Senates. (2015). Focus on the Senate: Modern concepts inthe functioning of Senates in bicameral parliamentary systems;...
  • Aytekin, A. (2015). Kapitalistleşme ve Merkezileşme Kavşağında. In G. Atılgan vd(Ed.), Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Türkiye’de Siyasal Hayat (pp....
  • Chattopadhyay, R. (2011). Sub-national second chambers and regional represen-tation: International experiences, Submission to Kelkar Committee...
  • CIA. (2016). http://www.cia.gov/ the-world-factbook/Demirel, A. (2013). Çok Partili Hayat: Siyaset, Partiler, Seçimler. In A.
  • Demirel, & S.Sözen (Eds.), Türk Siyasal Hayatı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim FakültesiYayınları.
  • Drexhage, B. (2015). Bicameral legislatures: An international comparison. Ministryof the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Directorate of Constitutional...
  • Dutter, L. E. (1990, June). Theoretical perspectives on ethnic political behavior inthe Soviet Union. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34(2),...
  • Evennett, H. (2004). Second chambers, House of Lords library note, LLN-2014-010.pdf.
  • Gençkaya, ÖF. (1999). Aspects of democratization in Turkey. In Yasushi (Ed.), (pp.Aspects of democratization in Turkey (pp. 2–21). Institute...
  • Halefom, H. (1998). The federal parliament of Ethiopia, Windhoek Session, April.
  • National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). (1996). One chamberor two? Deciding between a unicameral and bicameral legislature,...
  • Özdemir, H. (1997). Siyasal Tarih 1960–1980 [Political History 1960–1980]. InTürkiye Tarihi 4 Çağdaş Türkiye 1908-1980, [History of Turkey...
  • Özgişi, T. (2012). Türk Parlamento Tarihinde Cumhuriyet Senatosu [Senate inTurkish parliament history]. TBMM.
  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press, Ltd.
  • Reidy, A., & Russell, M. (1999). Second chambers as constitutional guardians & pro-tectors of human rights.
  • Russell, M. (2013). Rethinking bicameral strength: A three-dimensional approach.The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(3), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.773639The...
  • The Fetha Negest: The laws of kings, written in Arabiclanguage between (1235–1243), 13th c, translated by Abba Paulos Tzadua, HaileSellassie...
  • The 1961 Constitution of the Turkish Republic, Ankara, 1961.
  • The 1982 Constitution of the Turkish Republic, Ankara, 1982
  • The 1987 Constitution of the People Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 1987.
  • The 1995, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopian Constitution, Addis Ababa,Ethiopia.
  • Tanör, B. (2002). Osmanlı-Türk Anayasal Gelişmeleri 1789–1980, [Ottoman Turkishconstitutional developments (1789–1980)]. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Yavuz, B., & Bülbül, M. (2012). Çift Meclis Sistemi ve Türkiye, [Bicameral Systemand Turkey] Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi...