Narratives of conflict on TikTok: comparing the EU and China’s discursive strategies in the Israel–Hamas conflict

• Tang, Yahan ^[1] ; Yahan ; Infante Pineda, Sara ^[1] ; Martínez Borda, Rut ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Alcalá

     Universidad de Alcalá

     Alcalá de Henares, España

     
• Localización: Revista de Estudios Europeos, ISSN-e 2530-9854, ISSN 1132-7170, Nº. 87, 2026, págs. 406-456
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.24197/2repqy04
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • This study compares the narrative strategies of two international media outlets with contrasting institutional profiles: CGTN Europe, a state-run channel affiliated with the Chinese government, and Euronews, a pan-European broadcaster currently under private ownership, with an editorial line that remains independent. Based on a mixed-methods approach combining lexical analysis using TF-IDF, thematic clustering with BERTopic, and qualitative video analysis (including shot-by-shot examination), the study identifies key differences in the representation of the Israel–Hamas conflict on TikTok. CGTN Europe constructs a narrative that emphasizes the humanitarian dimension of the conflict, highlighting the impact on the civilian population in Gaza and advocating for a ceasefire, in alignment with the diplomatic positions expressed by the Chinese government in international forums. Euronews, by contrast, tends to adopt a more diverse discursive strategy, focused on the evolution of events and modular coverage rather than emotional repetition. This approach reflects its institutional commitment to editorial pluralism and informational neutrality. At the same time, securitization frames are also present, particularly in conflict-related contexts, where issues such as institutional stability, public order, and international law are emphasized. TikTok, with its algorithmic and emotionally driven logic, thus emerges as a strategic space in which media actors project micro-narratives adapted to the platform.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Balzacq, T. (2011): Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Routledge.
  • Bassou, Abdelkader (2024): «The EU’s Position on the Israel–Palestine Conflict: Norms, Contradictions, and Geopolitics», in https://ecfr.eu/article/the-eus-position-on-the-israel-palestine-conflict...
  • Belfer Center (2020): «Governing Cyberspace: State Control vs. The Multistakeholder Model»,in https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/governing-cyberspace-state-control-vs-multistakeholder-model...
  • Bjola, Corneliu y Holmes, Marcus (2015): Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. London, Routledge.
  • Callahan, William A. (2015): China Dreams: 20 Visions of the Future. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Cull, Nicholas J. (2008): «Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories». The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science...
  • Cull, Nicholas J. (2009): Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the Past. Los Angeles, Figueroa Press.
  • Deibert, Ronald (2020): Reset: Reclaiming the Internet for Civil Society. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.
  • de Vreese, Claes H. y Boomgaarden, Hajo G. (2006): «Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of the European Union». Journal...
  • Ellul, Jacques (1965): Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes. New York, Vintage Books.
  • Entman, Robert M. (1993): «Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm». Journal of Communication 43(4), 51-58.
  • Freedman, Lawrence (2006): The Transformation of Strategic Affairs. London, IISS Adelphi Paper 379.
  • Gillespie, Tarleton (2018): Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New...
  • Grootendorst, M. (2022): BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure.
  • Hallahan, Kirk et al. (2007): «Defining Strategic Communication». International Journal of Strategic Communication 1(1), 3-35.
  • Harold Nicolson (1963): Diplomacy. Oxford University Press, Londres.
  • Jacqué, P. y Ricard, P. (2024): «War in Gaza: The European Union’s Diplomatic Failure», in https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/06/05/war-in-gaza-the-eu-s-diplomatic-failure_6673792_4.html...
  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1927): Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York, Knopf.
  • Lin, J., & de Kloet, J. (2023): «TikTok and the platformisation from China: Geopolitical anxieties, repetitive creativities and future...
  • Lippmann, Walter (1922): Public Opinion. New York, Harcourt Brace.
  • Macdonald, Scot (2007): Propaganda and Information Warfare in the Twenty-First Century. London, Routledge.
  • McDonald, John W. y Diamond, Louise (1996): Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace. West Hartford, Kumarian Press.
  • Melissen, Jan (2005): The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013): Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. Routledge.
  • Nye, Joseph S. (2004): Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, Public Affairs.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015): Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
  • Repnikova, Maria (2022): Chinese Soft Power. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Roselle, Laura, Miskimmon, Alister y O’Loughlin, Ben (2014): «Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power». Media, War &...
  • Rosemain, M. (2021): «Egypt’s Sawiris to sell struggling broadcaster Euronews to Alpac Capital», in https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/egypts-sawiris-sell-struggling-broadcaster-euronews-alpac-capital-2021-12-17...
  • Saez, P., & Bryant, J. (2023): Understanding the role of narratives in humanitarian policy change. ODI Humanitarian Policy Group Working...
  • Su, Alice y Liu, Yuhan (2023): «Digital Diplomacy and the Soft Power of Europe». Global Media and China 8(1), 13-28.
  • Tocci, Nathalie (2007): «Profiling Normative Foreign Policy: The European Union and its Global Partners». CEPS Working Document No. 279.
  • U.S. National Defense University (2015): An Introduction to Public Opinion Warfare, Psychological Warfare and Legal Warfare. China Strategic...
  • Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2019): Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social...
  • Zaharna, Rhonda S. (2010): Battles to Bridges: U.S. Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Zeng, Jinghan (2021): «Artificial Intelligence and China’s Strategic Narrative». International Affairs 97(6), 1665-1682.
  • Zhao, Y. (2008): Communication in China: Political Economy, Power, and Conflict. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Zhou, Xiaoyan et al. (2021): «Public Health Communication on TikTok: A Content Analysis of COVID-19 Videos from Official Accounts». Health...