Incorporating exceptions and limitations to copyright law to incentivize the development of Artificial Intelligence in Latin America

• Marzetti, Maximiliano ^[1]
  1. [1] IESEG School of Management (France)
• Localización: Latin American Law Review: Lat. Am. Law Rev., ISSN-e 2619-4880, Nº. 9, 2022, págs. 19-33
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.29263/lar09.2022.02
• Títulos paralelos:
  • La incorporación de excepciones y limitaciones a las legislaciones de derechos de autor para impulsar el desarrollo de la Inteligencia Artificial en América Latina
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    En este artículo, analizo las ventajas y desventajas de incorporar excepciones y limitaciones a las leyes de derechos de autor de los países latinoamericanos a favor de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA). En la sección 1 se describen las amenazas y oportunidades que la IA puede representar para la región. La sección 2 se refiere a los efectos que la legislación de derechos de autor puede tener en las decisiones de inversión de las empresas de IA, a los beneficios potenciales para los países que las incorporen, se incluyen perspectivas de Derecho y Economía y de Derecho Comparado, y se analiza la actual asimetría regulatoria existente en la materia en la región. La sección 3 concluye con recomendaciones de políticas públicas.

  • English

    In this paper, I describe the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating new Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabling exceptions and limitations to the copyright laws of Latin American countries. Section 1 describes the threats and opportunities AI may pose to the region. Section 2 refers to the effects copyright legislation may have on investment decisions of AI firms, the potential benefits for countries incorporating them, Law & Economics and Comparative Law perspectives, and the current regulatory asymmetry in this matter across the region. Section 3 concludes with policy recommendations.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Albrieu, R., Rapetti, M., López Brest, C., Larroulet, P., & Sorrentino, A., CIPPEC, (2019). Inteligencia artificial y crecimiento económico....
  • “Better rules on Text and Data Mining are needed to maximize the potential of Artificial Intelligence in Europe” | LERU. (2018). Retrieved...
  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W....
  • Coase, R. H. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” The Journal of Law & Economics, 3.
  • Conference on the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Insights from the ‘exceptions’ panel: Copyright (un)harmonization?”...
  • Copeland, Jack. (2000). “What is Artificial Intelligence?” Retrieved December 7th, 2019, from [http://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/Reference-Articles/WhatisAI.html].
  • Crews, Kenneth D. (2017). Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries and Archives: Updated and Revised.
  • Depoorter, B., & Parisi, F. (2002). “Fair Use and Copyright Protection: A Price Theory Explanation.” International Review of Law and Economics,...
  • Estrategia de Inteligencia Artificial, 2018, https://datos.gob.mx/blog/estrategia-de-inteligencia-artificial-mx-2018?category=noticias&tag=nula.
  • Flynn, S., Geiger, C., Quintais, J., Margoni, T., Sag, M., Guibault, L., & Carroll, M. W. (2020, April 20). Implementing User Rights for...
  • Geiger, C., Geiger, C., Hilty, R., Griffiths, J., & Suthersanen, U. (2010). “Declaration A Balanced Interpretation of “TheThree-Step Test”...
  • GOV.UK. “Exceptions to copyright.” Retrieved November 29th, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright#text-and-data-mining-for-non-commercial-research].
  • Heller, M. A. (1998), “The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets.” Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–688.
  • Hugenholtz, B. (2019, July 24th). “The New Copyright Directive: Text and Data Mining (Articles 3 and 4)” - Kluwer Copyright Blog. Retrieved...
  • Hugenholtz, B. P., & Senftleben, M. R. F. (2011). “Fair Use in Europe. In search of flexibilities. “ Amsterdam Law School Research Paper...
  • Japanese Copyright Act no. 48 of May 6th, 1970, amended by Act No. 72 of July 13th, 2018.
  • Levendowski, Amanda. (2018). “How Copyright Law Can Fix Artificial Intelligence’s Implicit Bias Problem.” Wash. L. Rev., 93(579).
  • Marzetti, M. (2019). “Paying for works in the public domain? The “domaine public payant” in the 21st century.” GRUR Int., (343).
  • Mattei, U. (1994). “Efficiency in legal transplants: An Essay in Comparative Law and Economics.” International Review of Law and Economics,...
  • Nino, C. S. (2005). Un país al margen de la ley: estudio de la anomia como componente del subdesarrollo argentino. Ariel.
  • Ovanessoff, A., & Plastino, E. (2017), Accenture, “How Artificial Intelligence can drive South America’s growth.”
  • Oxford Insights. (2019). Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness2019.
  • Posner, R. A., & Landes, W. M. (2003). The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press.
  • PricewaterhouseCooper. (2017). Sizing the prize. What’s the real value of AI for your business, and how can you capitalise?
  • PricewaterhouseCooper. (2018). The macroeconomic impact of artificial intelligence.
  • Prosser, Marc (2020, February 5th). “How AI Helped Predict the Coronavirus Outbreak Before It Happened.” Retrieved April 28th, 2020, from...
  • “Public consultation initiative for digital government in Uruguay,” https://www.gub.uy/participacionciudadana/consultapublica.
  • Ronald H.Coase. “Prize Lecture to the Memory of Alfred Nobel,” 1991
  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row, p. 83.
  • Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
  • Senftleben, M. R. F. (2017). “The Perfect Match: Civil Law Judges and Open-Ended Fair Use Provisions.” American University International Law...
  • Stigler, G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price, 3rd ed., New York, Macmillan.
  • UK Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988.
  • US Copyright Office (2021). US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition, Section 306 “The Human Authorship Requirement”.
  • US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (2018). Opinion in re Naruto v. Slater, no. 16-15469.
  • US Supreme Court (1984). Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417.
  • WIPO. (2019). Technology Trends – Artificial Intelligence.
  • World Economic Forum. (2016). “Latin America is the world’s most unequal region. Here’s how to fix it.” Retrieved December 6th, 2019, from...