Grounds for reconciliation: participation and reparations at the Inter-American Human Rights System

• Mayra Nuñez Pastor ^[1]
  1. [1] Valencia International University, Spain
• Localización: Deusto journal of human rights = Revista Deusto de derechos humanos, ISSN 2530-4275, ISSN-e 2603-6002, Nº. 16, 2025 (Ejemplar dedicado a: The Road from Transitional Justice to Reconciliation), págs. 247-273
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.18543/djhr.3294
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Reconciliation in a transition requires interconnected events and processes to enable peaceful coexistence and restore trust in State institutions after a period of systematic violations to human rights. It involves articulating different transitional justice mechanisms. Prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations and guarantees of non-recurrence must be implemented comprehensively, ensuring victims’ families feel repaired. The absence of this balance hinders reconciliation. This research explores the participation of victims and their relatives in proceedings before the Inter-American Human Rights System (IAHRS) and the implementation of reparations as mechanisms for reconciliation. The study argues that victims’ relatives and survivors’ input in legal proceedings and horizontal relationships with legal representation foster agency and dignity, enabling reconciliation. Whereas full engagement in the IAHRS process promotes an inclusive legal environment, failure to implement Court-mandated reparations obstructs reconciliation with State institutions and the idea of justice itself, causing disillusionment.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Avocats Sans Frontières. 2019. Reflections on Victim Participation before the International Crimes Division in Uganda. Accessed November 10,...
  • Bar-Tal, Daniel, and Gemma H. Bennink. 2004. «The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process». In From conflict resolution to...
  • Doorn, Neelke. 2008. «Forgiveness and reconciliation in transitional justice practices». Ethical Perspectives 3: 381–98.
  • Dwyer, Susan. ‘Reconciliation for Realists’. Ethics & International Affairs 13 (March 1999): 81–98.
  • Fischer, Martina. 2011. «Transitional justice and reconciliation: Theory and practice». In Advancing Conflict Transformation. The Berghof...
  • Gibson, James L. 2002. «Truth, justice, and reconciliation: Judging the fairness of amnesty in South Africa». American Journal of Political...
  • Gómez Dupuis, Nieves. 2009. Plan de Sánchez. Una aproximación a la estrategia psicojurídica. Ciudad de Guatemala: ECAP.
  • González, Miguel Á.. 2006. Perú: Autoritarismo y democracia. Sobre las dificultades de la consolidación de la democracia en la América Andina....
  • Govier, Trudy, and Wilhelm Verwoerd. 2002. «The promise and pitfalls of apology». Journal of Social Philosophy 33(1): 67–82.
  • Gready, Paul, and Simon Robins. 2014. «From transitional to transformative justice: A new agenda for practice». The International Journal...
  • Greiff, Pablo de. 2015. «Security sector reform, including vetting of security institutions». A/70/438. Relatoría Especial sobre la Promoción...
  • IACtHR. 1997. Goiburú and others v. Paraguay. Court file (IACHR Evidence Appendix II).
  • IACtHR. 2006. Goiburú and others v. Paraguay. Judgment (Merits, Reparations and Costs).
  • IACtHR. 2008. Goiburú and others v. Paraguay. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Resolution of August 6.
  • IACtHR. 2009. Goiburú and others v. Paraguay. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Resolution of November 19.
  • IACtHR. 2010. Case of Gomes Lund (Guerrilha do Araguaia) v. Brazil. Jugdment (Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, Costs).
  • IACHR. 2014. Report No 6/14 (Merits). Case 12.788. Members of the Chichupac Village and Neighbouring Communities of the Municipality of Rabinal...
  • IACtHR. 2016a. Members of the Chichupac village and neighbouring Communities of the Municipality of Rabinal v. Guatemala. Court file (Part...
  • IACtHR. 2016b. Members of the Chichupac Village and Neighboring Communities of the Municipality of Rabinal v. Guatemala. Public Hearing of...
  • IACtHR. 2016c. Members of the Chichupac Village and Neighbouring Communities of the Municipality of Rabinal v. Guatemala. Judgment (Preliminary...
  • IACtHR. 2018. Case of Maurilia Coc Max et al. (Xamán Massacre) v. Guatemala. Judgment (Merits, reparations and costs).
  • IACtHR. 2019. Goiburú and others v. Paraguay. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Resolution of May 14.
  • IACtHR. 2022. Dismissed Employees of Petroperú and Others v. Peru. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment resolution of Sep 9.
  • IACtHR. 2023. Regulations of the Psychological Support Service for Declarants before the Inter-American Court.
  • IACtHR. 2024. Members of the Chichupac village and Neighboring Communities of the Municipality of Rabinal v. Guatemala. Monitoring Compliance...
  • Janssens, Bert. 2012. Oj K´aslik. Estamos vivos. Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica de Rabinal (1944-1996). Rabinal: Museo Comunitario de...
  • Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz. 2023. DAV (Dirección de Atención a Víctimas). Accessed November 10, 2025: https://www.jep.gov.co/Planeacion1/Informes%20de%20gesti%C3%B3n/2022/20230125_DAV%20Visor%20Vigencia%202022.pdf#search=DAV.
  • Madlingozi, Tshepo. 2010. On transitional justice entrepreneurs and the production of victims’. Journal of Human Rights Practice 2(2): 208–28.
  • Martin Beristain, Carlos. 1998. «Health, memory, and human rights in Guatemala». The Lancet 352 (9129): 733–34.
  • Martín Beristain, Carlos. 2009. Diálogos sobre la reparación: qué reparar en los casos de violaciones de derechos humanos. Quito: Ministerio...
  • OAS. 1996. IACHR: 93 Period of sessions. Accessed November 10, 2025: https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/sessions/default.asp?S=93.
  • OAS/IACHR. 2021. IACHR Reports good results in 2020, the fourth year of its program to overcome procedural backlog. 1 February. Accessed November...
  • Oficina de Derechos Humanos, Arzobispado de Guatemala (ODHAG). 1998. Guatemala: Nunca más. El entorno histórico. Ciudad de Guatemala: ODHAG.
  • OHCHR. 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparations and Guarantees of non-Recurrence. Ways in Which...
  • Pérez Liñán, Aníbal, Luis Schenoni, and Kelly Morrison. 2023. «Compliance in time: Lessons from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights»....
  • Phakathi, Sizwe T., and Hugo van der Merwe. 2008. «The impact of the TRC’ amnesty process on survivors of human rights violations». In Truth...
  • Rettberg, Angélika, ed. 2005. Entre el perdón y el paredón: preguntas y dilemas de la justicia transicional. 1. ed. Bogotá: Uniandes.
  • Robins, Simon, and Erik Wilson. 2015. «Participatory methodologies with victims: an emancipatory approach to transitional justice research»....
  • Romero, Juan P. 2010. «De un dolor a un saber: cuerpo, sufrimiento y memoria en los límites de la escritura». Papeles Del CEIC 2: 1–27.
  • Sharp, Dustin. 2013. «Beyond the post-conflict checklist: linking peacebuilding and transitional justice through the lens of critique». Chicago...
  • Sharp, Dustin. 2016. Interrogating the peripheries:The Preoccupations of Fourth GenerationTransitional Justice. https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9944-3005.
  • Simangan, Dahlia. 2017. «The pitfalls of local involvement: justice and reconciliation in Cambodia, Kosovo and Timor-Leste». Peacebuilding...
  • Tavuchis, Nicholas. 1991. Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Theidon, Kimberly. 2006. «Justice in transition: The micropolitics of reconciliation in postwar Peru». The Journal of Conflict Resolution...
  • Verdeja, Ernesto. 2009. Unchopping a tree: Reconciliation in the aftermath of political violence, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.