El debate sobre cómo interpretar la Constitución americana: ¿una cuestión de elección?

• Andrea Acosta Massó ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Navarra

     Universidad de Navarra

     Pamplona, España

     
• Localización: Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 45, Nº 135, 2025, págs. 383-396
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • The debate over the interpretation of the US Constitution: ¿a matter of choice?

• Es reseña de:

  • How to interpret the Constitution

    Cass R. Sunstein

    Princeton University Press, 2023

• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Baude, W. y Sachs, S. E. (2017). The Law of interpretation. Harvard Law Review, 130 (4), 1079-1147.
  • Bobbitt, P. (1982). Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Böckenförde, E.-W. (1993). Escritos sobre Derechos Fundamentales. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
  • DeGirolami, M. O. (2024). Traditionalism Rising. The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 24 (1), 9-56.
  • Dworkin, R. (1996). The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Ekins, R. (2017). Objects of interpretation. Constitutional Commentary, 31 (1-2), 96-124. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00132.
  • Ely, J. H. (1981). Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674249127.
  • Girgis, S. (2023). Living Tradiotionalism. New York University Law Review, 98 (5), 1937-1940.
  • Girgis, S. (2024). Originalism’s age of ironies. Harvard Law Review, 138 (1), 1-21. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4964888.
  • Grey, T. C. (1975). Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution? Stanford Law Review, 27 (3), 703-718. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228335.
  • Hesse, K. (1983). Escritos de Derecho Constitucional. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
  • Kavanagh, A. (2003). The Idea of a Living Constitution. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 16 (1), 55-89. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900006639.
  • Kramnick, I. (1999). The Portable Edmund Burke. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Lessig, L. (1995). Understanding Changed Readings: Fidelity and Theory. Stanford Law Review, 47 (3), 395-472.
  • Mathews, J. (2023). How to interpret the Constitution. Foreign Affairs, 103, 188.
  • Pojanowski, J. y Walsh, K. C. (2016). Enduring Originalism. Georgetown Law Journal, 105, 97-158.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605.
  • Savigny, C. F. (2005). Sistema del Derecho Romano actual. Granada: Comares.
  • Scalia, A. (1997). A Matter of Interpretation. Princenton: Princenton University Press.
  • Simón Yarza, F. (2016). La interpretación de los derechos en perspectiva teórica y práctica. En VV. AA. La Constitución política de España....
  • Strauss, D. (2010). The Living Constitution. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2023). How to interpret the Constitution. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Thayer, J. B. (1893). Constitutional Law, the origin and scope of the american doctrine. Harvard Law Review, 7 (1), 129-156.
  • Tribe, L. H. (1996). Taking Text and Structure Seriously: Reflections on Free-Form Method in Constitutional Interpretation. Harvard Law Review,...
  • Urbina, F. J. (2023). It doesn’t matter what “interpretation” is. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  • Urbina, F. J. (2024). Reasons for Interpretation. Columbia Law Review, 124, 1661-1740.
  • Vermeule, A. (2022). Common good constitutionalism: recovering the classical legal tradition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Waluchow, W. (2005). Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 18 (2), 207-247.
  • Watkins, J. W. (2023). How to interpret the Constitution, Cass R. Sunstein. The Independent Review, A Journal of Political Economy, 28.