The Methodology of Analytic Jurisprudence

• Pierluigi Chiassoni ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Genoa

     University of Genoa

     Genoa, Italia

     
• Localización: Analisi e diritto = Análisis y derecho = Law and analysis = Droit et analyse = Análise e direito, ISSN 1126-5779, ISSN-e 2785-7220, Vol. 21, Nº. 2 (Publicado: 22-12-2021), 2021, págs. 9-47
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The paper purports to provide a tentative introduction to the methodology of analytic jurisprudence. Section 1 puts to the fore ten basic principles of the analytic approach. Section 2 draws the charter of analytic jurisprudence, distinguishing an expository and a normative variety thereof. Section 3 draws up a bird-eye survey of some of the main tools the mastery of which fares as a necessary condition for fruitful analytic enquiries upon the law. Section 4 outlines a variety of analytic conceptual analysis as a response to some recent skepticism. Section 5, finally, strikes a blow in favour of analytic legal philosophy against a variety of (allegedly) truly “philosophical” jurisprudence, by way of a comparative argument concerning their respective dealing with the “concept of law” issue.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aa.Vv. (1956). The Revolution in Philosophy, London, MacMillan.
  • Aa.Vv. (1962). La philosophie analytique, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit.
  • Alexy, R. (1978). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationale Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung, Frankfurt...
  • Alexy, R. (2001). The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Alexy, R. (2006). On the Concept and the Nature of Law, «Ratio Juris», 21, 3, 281-299.
  • Alexy, R. (2017). The Ideal Dimension of Law, in Duke, George (eds.) (2017), 14-341.
  • Alexy, R, Bulygin, E. (2001). La pretensión de corrección del derecho. La polémica Alexy/Bulygin sobre la conexión necesaria entre derecho...
  • Austin, J. (1832), The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, with an Introduction by H.L.A. Hart, New York, The Noonday Press, 1954.
  • Austin, J.L. (1956-57). A Plea for ffxcuses, in Austin J.L. (1961), 123-152.
  • Austin, J.L. (1961). Philosophical Papers, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Ayer, A.J. (ed.) (1959). Logical Positivism, New York, The Free Press.
  • Barberis, M. (2020). Philosophia Perennis Comes Back. The Case of Robert Alexy, «Rivista di filosofia del diritto», IX, 2, 247-263.
  • Bentham, J. (1776). A Fragment on Government, The new authoritative edition by J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart, With an Introduction by R. Harrison,...
  • Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. by J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart, London, University of...
  • Bentham, J. (1817). Chrestomatia. Part II. Being an ffssay on Nomenclature and Clas- sification, London, Payne and Foss.
  • Bernal Pulido (ed.) (2011). La doble dimensión del derecho. Autoridad y razón en la obra de Robert Alexy, Lima, Palestra.
  • Bezemek, C., Ladavac, N. (eds.) (2016). The Force of Law Reaffirmed. Frederick Schauer Meets the Critics, Cham, Springer.
  • Bix, B. (2007). Joseph Raz and Conceptual Analysis, «APA Newsletter», 6 (2), 1-7.
  • Bobbio, N. (1965). Giusnaturalismo e positivismo giuridico, Milano, Comunità.
  • Bobbio, N. (1998). fflogio della mitezza e altri scritti morali, Milano, Pratiche.
  • Bodenheimer, E. (1956). Modern Analytical Jurisprudence and the Limits of its Use- fulness, «University of Philadelphia Law Review», 104,...
  • Bulygin, E. (1993). Alexy y el argumento de la corrección, in Alexy, Bulygin (2001), 41-51.
  • Bulygin (2000). La tesis de Alexy sobre la conexión necesaria entre el derecho y la moral, in Alexy, Bulygin (2001), 85-93.
  • Carnap, R. (1932). The fflimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Lan- guage, in Ayer (ed.) (1959), 60-81.
  • Carnap, R. (1950a). The Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.
  • Carnap, R. (1950b). ffmpiricism, Semantics, and Ontology, in Carnap (1956), 205-221.
  • Carnap, R. (1956). Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, Enlarged edition, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago...
  • Carnap, R. (1959). The Logical Syntax of Language, Paterson, N.J., Littlefield, Adams & Co.
  • Carnap, R. (1963). Intellectual Autobiography, in Schilpp (ed.) (1963), 1-84.
  • Castignone, S., Guastini, R., Tarello, G. (1994). Introduzione teorica allo studio del diritto. Prime lezione, Genova, Ecig.
  • Chiassoni, P. (2011a). Alexy y la doble naturaleza del derecho: comentarios escépticos, in Bernal Pulido (ed.) (2011), 127-142.
  • Chiassoni, P. (2011b). Constitutionalism out of a Positivist Mind Cast: The Garantismo Way, «Res Publica», 17, 327-342.
  • Chiassoni, P. (2013). The Model of Ordinary Analysis. In D’Almeida, Edwards, Dol- cetti (eds.) (2013), 247-267.
  • Chiassoni, P. (2016a). Da Bentham a ffelsen. Sei capitoli per una storia della filosofia analitica del diritto, Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Chiassoni, P. (2016b). ffl discreto placer del positivismo jurídico, Bogotá, Externado de Colombia.
  • Chiassoni, P. (2016c). Supporting the Force of Law: A Few Complementary Arguments Against ffssentialist Jurisprudence, in Bezemek, Ladavac...
  • Chiassoni, P. (2019). Interpretation without Truth. A Realistic ffnquiry, Cham, Springer.
  • Cohen, L.J. (1955). Theory and Definition in Jurisprudence, «Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society», 29, 220-238.
  • Coleman, J. (ed.) (2001). Hart’s Postscript. ffssays on the Postscript to The Concept of Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Cowan, D.V. (1963). An Agenda for Jurisprudence, «Cornell Law Quarterly», 49, 609-632.
  • D’Almeida, D., Edwards, J., Dolcetti, A. (eds.) (2013). Reading H.L.A. Hart’s The Concept of Law, Oxford and Portland, Hart.
  • Descartes, R. (1641). Meditationes de prima philosophia, tr. it., Meditazioni metafisi- che, Milano, Bompiani, 2001.
  • Dickson, J. (2001). ffvaluation and Legal Theory, Oxford and Portland, Hart.
  • Dickson, J. (2004). Methodology in Jurisprudence: A Critical Survey, «Legal Theory», 10, 117-156.
  • Dickson, J. (2006). Descriptive Legal Theory, in IVR ffncyclopedia of Legal Philoso- phy and Jurisprudence, available on the net.
  • Dickson, J. (2015). Ours is a Broad Church: Indirectly ffvaluative Legal Philosophy as a Facet of Jurisprudential Inquiry, «Jurisprudence»,...
  • Dickson, J. (2017). Why General Jurisprudence Is Interesting, «Crítica», 147, 11-40.
  • Dworkin, R. (2006). Justice in Robes, Cambridge and London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs, Cambridge and London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Endicott, T. (2002). Law and Language, in Stanford ffncyclopedia of Philosophy. First published Thu Dec 5, 2002; substantive revision Fri...
  • Enoch, D. (2019). Is General Jurisprudence Interesting?, in Plunkett, D., Shapiro, S. (eds.) (2019), 65-86.
  • Farrell, I. P. (2006). H.L.A. Hart and the Methodology of Jurisprudence, «Texas Law Review», 84, 983-1011.
  • Frege, G. (1892). On Concept and Object, in P. Geach, M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford,...
  • Giudice, M. (2015). Understanding the Nature of Law: A Case for Constructive Con- ceptual ffxplanation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Guastini, R. (2011). La sintassi del diritto, Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1954). Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence, in Hart (1983a), 21-48.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1955). Theory and Definition in Jurisprudence, «Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society», 29, 1955, 239-264.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The Concept of Law, Third Edition, Oxford, Oxford Univer- sity Press.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1963). Law, Liberty and Morality, London, Oxford University Press, 1963
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1967). Problems of the Philosophy of Law, in Hart (1983a), 88-119.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. ffssays in the Philosophy of Law, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1970). Jhering’s Heaven of Concepts and Modern Analytical Jurispru- dence, in Hart (1983a), 265-277.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1982). ffssays on Bentham. Jurisprudence and Political Theory, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1983b). Introduction, in Hart (1983a), 1-18.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1983a). ffssays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1987). Comment, in R. Gavison (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy. The Influence of H.L.A. Hart, Oxford, Clarendon...
  • Hempel, C.G. (1952), Fundamentals of Concept Formation in ffmpirical Science, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
  • Himma, K.E. (2007). Reconsidering a Dogma: Conceptual Analysis, the Naturalistic Turn, and Legal Philosophy, «Law and Philosophy», 1-23.
  • Himma, K.E. (2015). Conceptual Jurisprudence. An Introduction to Conceptual Anal- ysis and Methodology in Legal Theory, «Revus», 26, 65-92.
  • Jackson, F. (1998). From Metaphysics to ffthics. A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Jori, M., Pintore, A. (2014). Concetto di diritto, in Jori, Pintore (2014), 41-56.
  • Jori, M., Pintore, A. (2014). Introduzione alla filosofia del diritto, Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Kant, I. (1970). Antropologia dal punto di vista pragmatico, in Id., Critica della ragion pratica e altri scritti morali, ed. by P. Chiodi,...
  • Kantorowicz, H. (1958). The Definition of Law, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge.
  • Lalumera, E. (2009). Cosa sono i concetti, Roma-Bari, Laterza.
  • Langlinais, A., Leiter, B. (2013), The Methodology of Legal Philosophy, available on the web.
  • Laslett (ed.) (1956). Philosophy, Politics and Society, Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Leiter, B. (2007). Naturalizing Jurisprudence. ffssays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University...
  • Leiter, B. (2008). Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Three Approaches, The University of Chicago Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working...
  • Leiter, B. (2012). Naturalism in Legal Philosophy, in Stanford ffncyclopedia of Philos- ophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-naturalism/.
  • Luque, P. (2017). The Interestingness of the Non-interestingness Objection to Gener- al Jurisprudence, «Crítica», 147, 6-10.
  • Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (2011). Concepts, in Stanford ffncyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/.
  • Marmor, A. (2012). Farewell to Conceptual Analysis (in Jurisprudence), University of Southern California Law School, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071,...
  • Moore, G.E. (1966). Lectures on Philosophy, London and New York, Routledge.
  • Moreso, J.J. (2017). ffl derecho: diagramas conceptuales, Bogotá, Universidad Exter- nado de Colombia.
  • Nino, C.S. (1983). Introducción al análisis del derecho, Barcelona, Ariel. Nino, C.S. (1994). La validez del derecho, Buenos Aires, Astrea.
  • Nino, C.S. (1994). Derecho, moral y política. Una revision de la teoría general del derecho, Barcelona, Ariel.
  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Pannam, C. (1964). Professor Hart and Analytical Jurisprudence, «Journal of Legal Education», 16, 379-404.
  • Perry, S.R. (2001). Hart’s Methodological Positivism, in J. Coleman (ed), Hart’s Post- script. ffssays on the Postscript to the Concept of...
  • Priel, D. (2007). Jurisprudence and Necessity, «Canadian Journal of Law and Juris- prudence», 20, 1, 173-200.
  • Plunkett, D., Shapiro, S. (2017). Law, Morality, and ffverything fflse: General Juris- prudence as a Branch of Metanormative Inquiry, «Ethics»,...
  • Plunkett, D., Shapiro, S. (eds.) (2019). Dimensions of Normativity. New ffssays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence, Oxford, Oxford University...
  • Priel, D. (2007). Jurisprudence and Necessity, «Canadian Journal of Law and Juris- prudence», 20, 1, 173-200.
  • Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and Object, Cambridge (Mass.), The M.I.T. Press.
  • Quine, W.V.O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other ffssays, New York and London, Columbia University Press.
  • Quine, W.V.O. (1975). Five Milestones of ffmpiricism, in Quine (1981), 67-72.
  • Quine, W.V.O. (1981). Theories and Things, Cambridge and London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Quine, W.V.O. (1992). Pursuit of Truth, Revised Edition, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press.
  • Radbruch, G. (1946), Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law, «Oxford Journal of Legal Studies», 26, 2006, 1-11.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness. A Restatement, Edited by E. Kelly, Cambridge (Mass.) and London, England, The Belknap Press of Harvard...
  • Raz, J. (1983). The Problem about the Nature of Law, in Raz (1994), 195-209.
  • Raz, J. (1994). ffthics in the Public Domain. ffssays in the Morality of Law and Politics, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Raz, J. (2007). The Argument from Justice, or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism, in Raz (2009b), 313-335.
  • Raz, J. (2009a). Between Authority and Interpretation. On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Raz, J. (2009b). The Authority of Law. ffssays on Law and Morality, Second Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Robinson, R. (1954). Definition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Scarpelli, U. (1955). Il problema della definizione e il concetto di diritto, Milano, Nuvoletti.
  • Schauer, F. (2015). The Force of Law, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press.
  • Schauer, F. (2018). Law as a Malleable Artifact, in Burazin, Himma, Roversi (eds.) (2018), available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3183928.
  • Shapiro, S. (2011). Legality, Cambridge and London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Schilpp, P.A. (ed.) (1963). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle, Ill., Open Court, London, Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith Churchland, P. (2013). Foreword, in W.V.O. Quine, Word and Object, New Edition, Boston, The MIT Press, xi-xiv.
  • Strawson, P.F. (1956). Construction and Analysis, in Aa.Vv. (1956), 97-110.
  • Strawson, P.F. (1959). Individuals. An ffssay in Descriptive Metaphysics, London and New York, Routledge.
  • Strawson, P.F. (1962). Analyse, science et métaphysique, in Aa.Vv. (1962), 105-118.
  • Strawson, P.F. (1985). Analyse et métaphysique, Paris, Vrin.
  • Tarello, G. (1974). Diritto, enunciati, usi. Studi di teoria e metateoria del diritto, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  • Tarello, G. (1993a). Organizzazione giuridica e società moderna, in Castignone, Guastini, Tarello (1994), 5-29.
  • Tarello, G. (1993b). Il diritto positivo, in Castignone, Guastini, Tarello (1994), 109- 119.
  • Williams, G. (1945). The Controversy Concerning the Word “Law”, in Laslett (ed.) (1956), 134-156.