An ecological approach to the lexical evolution of Chinese English

• Melissa Xiaohui Qin ^[1] ; Xiaoyan Li ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Science and Technology Beijing, China
• Localización: International Journal of Bilingualism: interdisciplinary studies of multilingual behaviour, ISSN 1367-0069, Vol. 29, Nº. 3, 2025, págs. 493-516
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1177/13670069231223112
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Aims and objectives:

    Rooted in a contact-oriented stance, this study aims to approach the dynamic evolution of Chinese English lexis from the perspective of language ecology by seeking an ecological explanation of diachronic lexical change. Specifically, it attempts to investigate the division of labor between external and internal ecological factors motivating the evolutionary patterns of Chinese English lexis in the past 60 years.

    Methodology:

    A mixed-methods approach was adopted by combining meticulous coding of each lexical item and numerical calculation of the distribution of lexical manifestations on significant linguistic dimensions.

    Data collection and analysis:

    In terms of data collection, the Chinese English lexis was sourced coherently and longitudinally from Beijing Review (1958–2018). In terms of data analysis, a systematic analytical framework of five parameters (frequency, form, grammar, word formation, and semantics) was created before qualitatively charting the features and quantitatively calculating the statistics for the value of each parameter.

    Findings:

    Externally, ecological factors bear on lexical trends of all linguistic parameters except lexical forms; internally, system–internal interactions among lexical variants project congruent patterns of alignment among various sets of features of all parameters except grammar.

    Originality:

    Few studies have approached the Chinese English lexis from the diachronic perspective through the lens of language evolution based on coherently sourced data and systematic analytical procedures.

    Significance:

    The study is enlightening in providing basic statistics to permit comparisons of lexical evolution in the five linguistic parameters across Expanding Circle ecologies and in extending the evolutionary approach to language change to the lexical realm in the Chinese English context.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anesa P. (2019). Lexical innovation in World Englishes: Cross-fertilization and evolving paradigms. Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Ansaldo U. (2009). Contact languages: Ecology and evolution in Asia. Cambridge University Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Arends J. (2001). Social stratification and network relations in the formation of Sranan. In Norval S., Veenstra T. (Eds.), Creolization and...
  • Backus A. (2001). The role of semantic specificity in insertional codeswitching: Evidence from Dutch-Turkish. In Jacobson R. (Ed.), Codeswitching...
  • Backus A. (2012). A usage-based approach to borrowability (Tilburg papers in culture studies, no. 27). https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/files/30357235/TPCS_27_Backus.pdf Google...
  • Baumgardner R. J. (1998). Word-formation in Pakistani English. English World-Wide, 19(2), 205–246. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Beijing Review: Introduction. (2006, December 20). https://web.archive.org/web/20101026130525/http://www.bjreview.com.cn/txt/2006-12/20/content_51382.htm Google...
  • Berns M. (2019). Expanding on the expanding Englishes of the expanding circle. World Englishes, 38(1–2), 8–17. Crossref Web of Science Google...
  • Biermeier T. (2008). Word-formation in New Englishes: A corpus-based analysis. LIT. Google Scholar
  • Biermeier T. (2011). Lexical trends in Philippine English. In Bautista M. L. S. (Ed.), Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine...
  • Biermeier T. (2014). Compounding and suffixation in World Englishes. In Buschfeld S., Hoffmann T., Huber M., Kautzsch A. (Eds.), The evolution...
  • Biermeier T. (2017). Lexical trends in Philippine English revised. Philippine ESL Journal, 19, 25–44. Google Scholar
  • Bolton K. (2003). Chinese Englishes, a sociolinguistic history. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Bolton K., Graddol D. (2012). English in China today. English Today, 28(3), 3–9. Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
  • Bybee J. (1998). A functionalist approach to grammar and its evolution. Evolution of Communication, 2(2), 249–278. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Bybee J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
  • Cannon G. (1988). Chinese borrowing in English. American Speech, 63(1), 3–33. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Cannon G. (1992). Malay(sian) borrowings in English. American Speech, 67(2), 134–162. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Chan M., Kwok H. (1985). A study of lexical borrowing from Chinese into English with special reference to Hong Kong. University of Hong Kong. Google...
  • Cheng C. (1982). Chinese varieties of English. In Kachru B. B. (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp. 125–140). University...
  • Corne C. (1999). From French to Creole: The development of new vernaculars in the French colonial world. University of Westminster Press. Google...
  • Croft W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Longman. Google Scholar
  • DeGraff M. (1999). Creolization, language change and language acquisition: An epilogue. In DeGraff M. (Ed.), Language creation and language...
  • DeGraff M. (2001). On the origins of creoles: A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology, 5(2), 213–310. Google...
  • Dillon M. (2010). China: A modern history. Bloomsbury Publishing. Google Scholar
  • Evans S. (2015). Word-formation in Hong Kong English: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives. Asian Englishes, 17(2), 116–131. Crossref Google...
  • Gao L. (2001). The lexical acculturation of English in the Chinese context. Studies in the Linguistic Science, 31(2), 73–88. Google Scholar
  • Görlach M. (1995). Word-formation and the ENL: ESL: EFL distinction. In Görlach M. (Ed.), More Englishes: New studies in varieties of English...
  • Grant A. P. (2020). Contact-induced linguistic change: An introduction. In Grant A. P. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact (pp....
  • Haugen E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210–231. Crossref Google Scholar
  • He D. (2017). Perceptions of Chinese English and pedagogic implications for teaching English in China. In Xu Z., He D., Deterding D. (Eds.),...
  • He D. (2020). China English in World Englishes: Education and use in the professional world. Springer. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Hull D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago...
  • Humboldt W. (1836). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts....
  • Kachru B. B. (Ed.). (1982). The other tongue: English across cultures. University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar
  • Kirkpatrick A. (Ed.). (2010). The Routledge handbook of World Englishes. Routledge. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Knowlton E. C. (1970). Chinese, Japanese, and Korean loanwords in Webster’s third. American Speech, 45(1–2), 8–29. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Labov W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors (Vol. 1). Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Lass R. (1997). Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Leitner G., Sieloff I. (1998). Aboriginal words and concepts in Australian English. World Englishes, 17(2), 153–169. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Matras Y., Bakker P. (2003). The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances. Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Mesthrie R. (2020). Contact linguistics and World Englishes. In Nelson C. L., Proshina Z. G., Davis D. R. (Eds.), The handbook of World Englishes...
  • Mesthrie R., Bhatt R. M. (2008). World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge University Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Moller C. (1933). Zur Methodik der Fremdwortkunde (Acta Jutlandica 5). Reitzels. Google Scholar
  • Moody J. A. (1996). Transmission languages and source languages of Chinese borrowings in English. American Speech, 71(4), 405–420. Crossref Google...
  • Mufwene S. S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Mufwene S. S. (2008). Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. Continuum. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Muysken P. (1981). Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Highfield A., Valdman A. (Eds.), Historicity and variation...
  • Platt J. T., Weber H., Lian H. M. (1984). The new Englishes. Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Proshina Z. G. (2019). Elaborating on the Expanding Circle. World Englishes, 38(1–2), 233–244. Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
  • Qin M. X. (2023). A corpus-based approach to Chinese English lexis. World Englishes, 42(2), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12531 Google...
  • Qin M. X., Gao J. (2020). The Chinese English dictionary: An online resource for Chinese English lexicography. World Englishes, 39(1), 154–170. Crossref Web...
  • Qin M. X., Guo H. (2022). Word formation of Chinese English words: Evidence form the Chinese English Dictionary. World Englishes, 41(2), 151–168. Crossref Google...
  • Schneider E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Seargeant P. (2012). Exploring World Englishes: Language in a global context. Routledge. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Tan S. I. (2009). Lexical borrowing from Chinese languages in Malaysian English. World Englishes, 28(4), 451–484. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Tan S. I. (2013). Malaysian English: Language contact and change. Peter Lang. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Tent J. (2001). A profile of the Fiji English lexis. English World-Wide, 22(2), 209–245. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Thomason S. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Georgetown University Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Thomason S. (2010). Contact explanations in linguistics. In Hickey R. (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 31–47). Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref Google...
  • Thomason S., Kaufman T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. University of California Press. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Van Coetsem F. (1988). Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Foris. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Wang H. (2019). China and globalization: 40 years of reform and opening-up and globalization 4.0. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business...
  • Wei R., Su J. (2012). The statistics of English in China. English Today, 28(3), 10–14. Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
  • Weinreich U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Mouton. Google Scholar
  • Whitney W. D. (1881). On mixture in language. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 12, 5–26. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Winford D. (2010). Contact and borrowing. In Hickey R. (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 170–187). Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref Google...
  • Winford D. (2019). Theories of language contact. In Grant A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact (pp. 51–74). Oxford University...
  • Wray A., Grace G. W. (2007). The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic...
  • Xu Z. (2010). Chinese English: Features and implications. Open University of Hong Kong Press. Google Scholar
  • Xu Z. (2021). Chinese English: A future power? In Kirkpatrick A. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of World Englishes (2nd ed., pp. 265–280)....
  • Yang J. (2005). Lexical innovations in China English. World Englishes, 24(4), 425–436. Crossref Google Scholar
  • Yang J. (2009). Chinese borrowings in English. World Englishes, 28(1), 90–106.