Una sentenza sulla rappresentanza sindacale (o del lavoro?)

Autores: Gian Primo Cella
Localización: Lavoro e diritto, ISSN 1120-947X, Vol. 27, Nº. 4, 2013 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La rappresentatività sindacale e la Corte costituzionale), págs. 509-520
Idioma: italiano
DOI: 10.1441/75279
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)

Resumen
- The decision of the court arrives in a moment of great difficulties and uncertainties for the industrial relations, not only in the Italian case. A moment that lacks any promotional effort by the governments as far as union action is concerned. The comment is carried out from the point of view of industrial relations, that are mainly a great art of problem solving. The decision is very interesting because the court has been taking into account the changing context of industrial relations. A question is still open: the one regarding the survival in the Italian case of the model of single channel. Maybe that it could be useful to think about the possibility to come back to the dual channel model.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Cella G.P. (2012), DOcolta crescenti per le relazioni industriali europee e italiane, in SM, p. 29.
- Ghera E. (2013), Sull'art. 19 dello Statuto dei lavoratori, in DLRI, p. 185.
- Gluglú G. (1987), II modelo fantasma, in Micromega, p. 60.
- Pitkin H.F. (1967), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Romagnoli U. (1995), II lavoro in Italia. Un giurista racconta, Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Treu T. (2013), Le regole dele relazioni industriali: test per l'autoriforma, in Qua-derni di rassegna sindacale, n. 3, p. 35.

Mi Ágora