The conditions of committee importance – drawing lessons from a qualitative case study of Finland

• Aula, Ville ^[1] ; Raunio, Tapio ^[2]
  1. [1] London School of Economics and Political Science

     London School of Economics and Political Science

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] University of Tampere

     University of Tampere

     Tampere, Finlandia

     
• Localización: The Journal of legislative studies, ISSN 1357-2334, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2025, págs. 85-107
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2022.2153995
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Theories of parliamentary committees are often contradictory and recent studies have emphasised the need for theoretically-informed qualitative analyses of committee practices. In this paper we draw from 81 interviews with Finnish politicians, party employees, and parliamentary officials to analyse seven theoretical propositions. We show that contradictory theories to hold true under different conditions, allowing individual theories to both underestimate and overestimate committee importance if the interactions between factors are not considered. Based on the findings, we argue that theories have so far overlooked variation in the level of partisanship associated with individual bills. We identify factors that influence levels of partisanship and techniques to actively manage it. Finnish committees are controlled by political parties and the government coalition, but our analysis reveals that MPs have more freedom of maneuver than previously assumed. Overall, bargaining takes places during the committee stage but not so much within formal committee meetings.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • André, A., Depauw, S., & Martin, S. (2016). “Trust is good, control is better” multi-party government and legislative organization. Political...
  • Arter, D. (1984). The Nordic parliaments: A comparative analysis. Hurst.
  • Arter, D. (1999). Scandinavian politics today. Manchester University Press.
  • Aula, V., & Konttinen, L. (2020). Miten kansaa edustetaan? Selvitys kansanedustajientyöstä eduskuntatyön uudistamiseksi. Sitra reports...
  • Cox, G., & McCubbins, M. (2007). Legislative Leviathan. Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Crewe, E. (2015). The House of Commons: An anthropology of MPs at work.Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Fenno, R. F. (1973). Congressmen in committees. In The study of congress series.Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Gaines, B. J., Goodwin, M., Bates, S. H., & Sin, G. (2019). Conclusion: Prospects foranalysing committees in comparative perspective....
  • Geddes, M. (2020). Dramas at Westminster: Select committees and the quest foraccountability. Manchester University Press.
  • Gilligan, T., & Krehbiel, K. (1990). Organization of informative committees by arational legislature. American Journal of Political Science,...
  • Golden, M., & Min, B. (2013). Distributive politics around the world. Annual Reviewof Political Science, 16(1), 73–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/polisci.2013.16.issue-1.
  • Helander, V., & Pekonen, K. (2007). Eduskunnan vahvistuva valiokuntalaitos, inValiokunnat lähikuvassa: Suomen eduskunta 100 vuotta, osa...
  • King, A. (1976). Modes of executive-legislative relations: Great Britain, France, andWest Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 11–36....
  • Lees, D., & Shaw, M. (1979). Committees in legislatures: A comparative analysis. DukeUniversity Press.
  • Lin, N., & Yordanova, N. (2022). Circumventing coalition oversight in multipartygovernments: Bill referral to parliamentary committees...
  • Longley, L. D., & Davidson, R. H. (1998). Parliamentary committees: Changing per-spectives on changing institutions. The Journal of Legislative...
  • Mannevuo, M. (2020). Anxious politicians: Productivity imperatives in the FinnishParliament. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology,...
  • Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2011). Parliaments and coalitions: The role of legisla-tive institutions in multiparty governance. In Comparative...
  • Mattson, I., & Strøm, K. (1995). Parliamentary committees. In H. Döring(Eds.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 249–307)....
  • Mickler, T. (2017). Committee autonomy in parliamentary systems – Coalition logicor congressional rationales? Journal of Legislative Studies,...
  • Mickler, T. A. (2022). Parliamentary committees in a party-centred context: Lookingbehind the scenes. Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003147190
  • Mutanen, A., Ojanen, T., Sormunen, M., & Tuori, K. (2016). Eduskunnan budjetti- javalvontavalta 1990–2020: Tutkimus budjetti- ja valvontavallan...
  • Mykkänen, J. (2010). Keskusteleva edustaminen ja luottamus eduskunnassa.Politiikka, 52(3), 219–233.
  • Pekonen, K. (2011). Puhe eduskunnassa. Vastapaino.
  • Raunio, T. (2022). Committees in the Finnish Eduskunta: Cross-party cooperationand legislative scrutiny behind closed doors. In S. T. Siefken,...
  • Raunio, T., & Wiberg, M. (2008). The Eduskunta and the parliamentarisation ofFinnish politics: Formally stronger, politically still weak?...
  • Raunio, T., & Wiberg, M. (2014). Eduskunta: Kansanvaltaa puolueiden ja hallituksenehdoilla. Gaudeamus.
  • Ringe, N. (2010). Who decides, and how? Preferences, uncertainty, and policy choice inthe European parliament. Oxford University Press.
  • Rinne, J. M. (2020). Deliberative representation in parliament [PhD Thesis,University of Helsinki].
  • Rommetvedt, H. (2022). Norwegian parliamentary committees: Split and sidelined inthe process. In S. T. Siefken, & H. Rommetvedt (Eds.),...
  • Saalfeld, T., & Strøm, K. W. (2014). Political parties and legislators. In S. Martin, T.Saalfeld, & K. Strøm (Eds.), The Oxford handbook...
  • Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited: Part 1: The contemporarydebate. Chatham House.
  • Searing, D. (1994). Westminster’s world: Understanding political roles. HarvardUniversity Press.
  • Seo, H. S. (2017). Reaching out to the people? Parliament and citizen participation inFinland. Tampere University Press.
  • Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1994). Positive theories of congressional institutions.Legislative Studies Quarterly, 19(2), 149–179....
  • Shugart, M., Bergman, M., Struthers, C., Krauss, E., & Pekkanen, R. (2021). Party per-sonnel strategies. Oxford University Press.
  • Siefken, S. T., & Rommetvedt, H. (2022). Parliamentary committees in the policyprocess. Routledge.
  • Strøm, K. (1997). Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentarydemocracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3(1), 155–174....
  • Strøm, K. (1998). Parliamentary committees in European democracies. The Journalof Legislative Studies, 4(1), 21–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420538
  • Wiberg, M. (2000). The partyness of the Finnish Eduskunta. In K. Heidar, & R. Koole(Eds.), Parliamentary party groups in European democracies...