Institutional change and partisanship in the Canadian Senate

• Caplan, Michelle ^[1] ; Alcantara, Christopher ^[1] ; Turgeon, Mathieu ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Western Ontario

     University of Western Ontario

     Canadá

     
• Localización: The Journal of legislative studies, ISSN 1357-2334, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2025, págs. 236-247
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2023.2190695
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • The Canadian Senate was originally designed to act as an independent check onthe House of Commons but over time, rampant and increasing partisanshiprendered the Senate illegitimate in the eyes of the public. In 2014, Liberalleader Justin Trudeau tried to reverse these trends by expelling all LiberalSenators from his party in hopes of reducing partisanship and restoring theSenate to its original, independent function. To what extent did this decisionreduce partisanship? Using a difference-in-differences design, we analysealmost 7000 interventions over an 11-year period to find that partisanshipremains strong in the Senate, with ex-Liberal Senators more likely to raisewomen’s issues compared to Conservative Senators post-2014. This trendseems consistent with the Liberal Party’s strong and the Conservative Party’sweak feminist agenda after the Liberals formed the government in 2015.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’scompanion. Princeton University Press.
  • Ashe, J. (2020). Gender sensitivity under trudeau. In F. MacDonald, & A.Dobrowolsky (Eds.), Turbulent times, transformational possibilities?...
  • Bratton, K. A. (2005). Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success oftoken women in state legislatures. Politics & Gender,...
  • Bridgman, A. (2021). A nonpartisan legislative chamber: The influence of theCanadian Senate. Party Politics, 27(5), 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820911345
  • Campbell, R., Childs, S., & Lovenduski, J. (2010). Do women need women represen-tatives? British Journal of Political Science, 40(1),...
  • Caplan, M., McMahon, N., & Alcantara, C. (2021). Representing the constituency:Institutional design and legislative behaviour. Representation,...
  • Cosgrove, K. M. (2021). Andrew scheer and the post-harper conservative party. In J.Gillies, V. Raynauld, & A. Turcotte (Eds.), Political...
  • Crewe, E. (2010). An anthropology of the House of Lords: Socialisation, relationshipsand rituals. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3),...
  • Cross, W. (2010). Auditing Canadian democracy. UBC Press.
  • Cudmore, J. (2014). “Justin Trudeau removes senators from Liberal caucus.” CBCNews 29 January https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-removes-senators-from-liberal-caucus-1.2515273
  • Dunning, T. (2012). Natural experiments in the social sciences: A design-basedapproach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Godbout, J. F. (2020). Lost on division. University of Toronto Press.
  • Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automaticcontent analysis methods for political texts. Political...
  • Malcolm, C. (2017). “Andrew Scheer is a ‘feminist’?” Toronto Sun 2 August.
  • Marland, A. (2020). Whipped. UBC Press.
  • McCallion, E. (2019). “Feminist Senators are critical actors in women’s represen-tation.” Policy Options. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/november-2019/feminist-senators-are-critical-actors-in-womens-representation/
  • McCallion, E. (2022). From private influence to public amendment? CanadianJournal of Political Science, 55(3), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423922000488
  • McHugh, J. (2017). The Senate and the people of Canada. Lexington Books.
  • Norton, P. (2003). Part 1: Cohesion. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(4), 57–72.https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000306254
  • Osborn, T. L. (2012). How women represent women. Oxford University Press.
  • Paterson, S., & Scala, F. (2020). Feminist government or governance feminism? In F.MacDonald, & A. Dobrowolsky (Eds.), Turbulent times,...
  • Russell, M. (2013). Rethinking bicameral strength: A three-dimensional approach.The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(3), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.773639
  • Russell, M. (2014). Parliamentary party cohesion. Party Politics, 20(5), 712–723.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812453367
  • Russell, M., & Sciara, M. (2008). Independent parliamentarians En masse: The chan-ging nature and role of the ‘Crossbenchers’ in the House...
  • Smith, D. E. (2003). The Canadian Senate in bicameral perspective. University ofToronto Press.
  • Stephenson, L. B., Lawlor, A., Cross, W. P., Blais, A., & Gidengil, E. (2019). Provincialbattles, national prize? MQUP.
  • Swers, M. L. (2002). The difference women make. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Swers, M. L. (2013). Women in the club. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Tremblay, M., & Pelletier, R. (2000). More feminists or more women? InternationalPolitical Science Review, 21(4), 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512100214004
  • VandenBeukel, J. R., Cochrane, C., & Godbout, J.-F. (2021). Birds of a feather?Loyalty and partisanship in the reformed Canadian Senate....
  • Wolbrecht, C. (2020). The politics of women’s rights: parties, positions, and change.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831241