Common market law review

• 

  Año 2014, Vol. 51, Número 2

  • Editorial comments

    • Seleccionado

      An unintended side-effect of Draghi's bazooka: an opportunity to establish a more balanced relationship between the ECJ and Member States' highest courts

      págs. 375-387

      

  • Articles

    • Seleccionado

      A Memorandum of Misunderstanding - The doomed road of the European Stability Mechanism and a possible way out: enhanced cooperation

      Michael Schwarz

      • Resumen

      págs. 389-423

      
    • Seleccionado

      Contrasting models of EU administration in judicial review of risk regulation

      Christopher Anderson

      • Resumen

      págs. 425-454

      
    • Seleccionado

      Judicial appointments: the Article 255 TFEU advisory panel and selection procedures in the Member States

      Tomás Dumbrovský, Bilyana Petkova, Marijn Van Der Sluis

      • Resumen

      págs. 455-482

      
    • Seleccionado

      Consumers' access to EU competition law procedures: outer and inner limits

      Katalin Cseres, Joana Mendes

      • Resumen

      págs. 483-521

      
    • Seleccionado

      De minimis meets "market access": transformations in the substance - and the syntax - of EU free movement law?

      Max S. Jansson, Harri Kalimo

      • Resumen

      págs. 523-558

      
    • Seleccionado

      Europe's copyright law decade: recent case law of the European Court of Justice and policy perspectives

      Matthias Leistner

      • Resumen

      págs. 559-600

      

  • Case law - Court of Justice

    • Seleccionado

      The curious case of frontier workers and studi finance: Giersch. Case C-20/12, Elodie Giersch v. État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Fifth chamber) of 20 June 2013

      Siofra O'Leary

      págs. 601-622

      
    • Seleccionado

      Respecting linguistic identity within the EU's internal market: Las. Case C-202/11, Anton Las v. Psa Antwerp NV, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 April 2013

      Elke Cloots

      págs. 623-645

      
    • Seleccionado

      Turkish service recipients under the EU-Turkey Association agreement: Demirkan. Case C-221/11, Leyla Ecem Demirkan v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2013

      Vassilis Hatzopoulos

      págs. 647-664

      
    • Seleccionado

      The freedom to conduct a business and the right to recieve information for free: Sky Österreich. Case C-283/11, Sky Österreich GmbH v. Österreichischer Rundfunk, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 22 January 2013

      Wouter Hins

      págs. 665-677

      
    • Seleccionado

      Absorbing EU ETS windfall profits and the principle of free allowances: Iberdrola and others. Joined Cases C-566/11, C-567/11, C-580/11, C-591/11, C-620/11 and C-640/11, Iberdrola and others v. Administración del Estado, judgment of the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) of 17 October 2013

      Daniel Pérez Rodríguez

      págs. 679-695